catalog

Well-known member
I think the novel as a form definitely reached its apotheosis in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Before film, telly radio took over.
 

catalog

Well-known member
Yeah I take that point, that they have different functions, therefore can be enjoyed in different ways, but, and I think I'm in agreement with WYH, it's about what's dominant or primary as the storytelling medium of the moment. Now, it's the Internet. Then, it was the novel. Perhaps that is simplistic, but I do think there's something in it. Like reading bleak house now, it reminds me most of watching a decent 60 hour TV series, it has that same function. Gets that deep. But harder to interact with / get into at first cos it's not the dominant thing
 

borzoi

Well-known member
yea and that's why novels now (speaking strictly about mainstream litfic) are either written to be adapted into streaming shows or lean into the form of the novel to the point where you have a collection of beautifully written sentences and not much else (the ben lerner mentioned above).
 

borzoi

Well-known member
i think novels build up the foundation of your brain, like the machinery in back that keeps it working. and they sit there and percolate for a long time and can come back to you. whereas the internet makes everything little bites of content like eating just sour patch kids. so i read a lot to counter the effects of the internet basically. i've read part of i hate the internet and it did do a good job of capturing the feel of online but it still feels wrong to read it in a book. like some malevolent force has escaped from the screen into the outside world.
 

borzoi

Well-known member
lol they're not my thing either, i'm not really a "sentence guy". but you know what i mean. that kind of diamond hard mfa prose.
 
Top