john eden

male pale and stale
I don't think you're bloodthirsty enough for revolution.

You're kind of exactly the person who should lead something like that and that's why you never will. You'll be shoved out the way by all the power mad cunts and arseholes.

Mildly terrified by your divination skills but it sounds like a wild ride.:oops:
 

luka

Well-known member
Danny tell us about your rightwards journey. Milestones along the way. When you realised you'd left the left behind
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
As I mentioned in COTD, I was listening to Eminem's second album the other day and in retrospect it seems like the clarion call of the alt right, though I suppose it's just an early symptom of the disaffection and cynicism re: the hypocritical edifice of mainstream American society. I'm sure there are reams of essays being written about/which have already been written about this subject.
 

luka

Well-known member
There's nothing to aspire to. You can show you're too smart for it by taking the piss. It's better than being a mark. But there's nowhere to go.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
I actually wanted to make a thread about this, specifically about running an alt-right ideological subroutine within a ultimately progressive framework (two layers of pragmatism), in the interest of finding weak spots in the machine, escapeways for the swelling energy underneath - but I fear my banter protocols aren't yet sharp enough to keep a thread running long enough.

Plus the dogma of it all is, not unjustifiably, met with resistance. Admirable human resistance.
 

luka

Well-known member
Don't underestimate Mr Eden's thirst for blood. He's committed to violent revolution and knows the only way out of here is lined with corpses.
 

sus

Moderator
As I mentioned in COTD, I was listening to Eminem's second album the other day and in retrospect it seems like the clarion call of the alt right, though I suppose it's just an early symptom of the disaffection and cynicism re: the hypocritical edifice of mainstream American society. I'm sure there are reams of essays being written about/which have already been written about this subject.

That sounds like an excuse not to write your own. I've never seen that take! Give it to us Corpsey
 

sus

Moderator
I actually wanted to make a thread about this, specifically about running an alt-right ideological subroutine within a ultimately progressive framework (two layers of pragmatism), in the interest of finding weak spots in the machine, escapeways for the swelling energy underneath - but I fear my banter protocols aren't yet sharp enough to keep a thread running long enough.

Yeah this is basically how I view my ideological stance
 

sus

Moderator
The deep layers are veganism, Singer-style expanding circle, utilitarianism, Rawls's invisible veil, identity fluidity/flux

The surface layers are an interest in technocracy, libertarianism; a distaste for identity politics; a flirting with voting for DJT (undecided)
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
Don't know if you looked through the second order pragmatism thread, but this is what I was getting at: the difficulty lies in nesting one belief system within a larger belief system. Because they are different, there will be contradictions. How can one be sure that the larger, "true" belief system will win out?

But the trick would involve some of the schizo stuff thats been brought up from time to time, as well as a basic understanding of incompleteness. It should be possible to operate within an inconsistent value system without merely bing ignorant or hypocritical.

Or perhaps the trick would just be the ability to instantaneously distance yourself from your current belief system. If you can do this, you can work out the ifs to the thens, perhaps effectively weaving between a collection of value systems.

It would also be, potentially, non-dialectical, which is hard for me to imagine because I practically live by the dialectical method.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
Yeah and I'd be interested in exploring (further) the dynamics of a communist core with a capitalist cortex - but a thick cortex, perhaps the core being a point.
 

sus

Moderator
Don't know if you looked through the second order pragmatism thread, but this is what I was getting at: the difficulty lies in nesting one belief system within a larger belief system. Because they are different, there will be contradictions. How can one be sure that the larger, "true" belief system will win out?

But the trick would involve some of the schizo stuff thats been brought up from time to time, as well as a basic understanding of incompleteness. It should be possible to operate within an inconsistent value system without merely bing ignorant or hypocritical.

Or perhaps the trick would just be the ability to instantaneously distance yourself from your current belief system. If you can do this, you can work out the ifs to the thens, perhaps effectively weaving between a collection of value systems.

It would also be, potentially, non-dialectical, which is hard for me to imagine because I practically live by the dialectical method.

I more just see it as a means/ends separation. I think a lot of so-called "progressive" values are means-focused and won't actually improve people's lives, or the state of the world. A lot of progressives are pussies who can't or don't want to bite necessary bullets, it's all good-feely stuff.
 

sus

Moderator
I'd sooner see a hyper-capitalist environment with good safety nets and serious eugenics than I would a communist state that just breeds human mediocrity and slave morality for millennia as standard of living slowly crumbles
 
Top