N
nomadologist
Guest
Oh for fuck's sake, I'm 'dumb', am I, nomad? You have to be the most monochromatic thinker on this forum, and that's saying something. I once quoted someone (who was in turn quoting something) else, and something they said which wasn't even part of my main argument is now something I hold to be unshakably true? Yeah, OK, whatever. I deny that an equation relating mass, energy and the speed of light can be sexist and all of a sudden I'm denying the historical oppression of women? Well, I guess hard logic belongs to that fuddy-duddy, dead-in-the-water tradition of analytic philosophy, and is probably inherently mysogynistic anyway...
Can you explain to me, without using terms like 'cultural metatext' and 'socio-sexual hegemony', why an equation - a statement that's not even about human beings, let along men and women - can be seen as 'sexed'?
If you can, I'd love to hear it.
I never said you denying the cultural oppression of women. Where are you getting that? I'm saying you simply don't seem to have read any of these philosophers you're trying to desperately to dismiss on "scientific" terms.