slackk
-
I don't need to assert equivalence at all, it's well established that these discussions are based on hypothetical references to external sources and how ideas are interpreted to further an argument. There is an unsolicited graph from an unknown location that shows big Swedish cases numbers and there is the established concept that "deaths lag behind cases," so we are allowed to move on without establishing any substance either way. That's how covid discussions work.
For example.
*
Personally I just want to get on with things and would like to see a mitigation strategy from somewhere for once.
Being anti-lockdown is an admirable cause in a sense because we are just expressionist animals really and that's a cool thing to be in general. But, I just don't see anyone with any competent strategies attempting to further the discourse. Where are the people with practical knowledge and applicable skills attempting to resolve the issue. The narrative is led by quasi-right ghouls and spectres with no real applicable evidence.
The real dynamic risk assessments validate the usage of good quality masks and its plain to see that it's the case. People* have worked with respirable diseases/fibres for years and PPE is actually a piece of piss solution to the issue. Wear a decent mask and have a basic understanding of physics and you should understand the weight of the virus and how it's mitigated. But the widespread anti-lockdown argument can't be allowed to validate the concept of the mask because of some semi-conceptual orthodoxy wherein it is a dismissal of unknown liberty.
I dunno it just seems like it's easier to maintain an opposition using oblique dismissal strategies like "Sweden!!" rather than creation of practical solutions to the problem. Where are the RAMS
I think pubs and restaurants are fucked for now but otherwise I'd like to get on with life.
Lockdown is not necessary in the UK, for instance - the case-rate increase was decreasing before lockdown.
For example.
*
Personally I just want to get on with things and would like to see a mitigation strategy from somewhere for once.
Being anti-lockdown is an admirable cause in a sense because we are just expressionist animals really and that's a cool thing to be in general. But, I just don't see anyone with any competent strategies attempting to further the discourse. Where are the people with practical knowledge and applicable skills attempting to resolve the issue. The narrative is led by quasi-right ghouls and spectres with no real applicable evidence.
The real dynamic risk assessments validate the usage of good quality masks and its plain to see that it's the case. People* have worked with respirable diseases/fibres for years and PPE is actually a piece of piss solution to the issue. Wear a decent mask and have a basic understanding of physics and you should understand the weight of the virus and how it's mitigated. But the widespread anti-lockdown argument can't be allowed to validate the concept of the mask because of some semi-conceptual orthodoxy wherein it is a dismissal of unknown liberty.
I dunno it just seems like it's easier to maintain an opposition using oblique dismissal strategies like "Sweden!!" rather than creation of practical solutions to the problem. Where are the RAMS
I think pubs and restaurants are fucked for now but otherwise I'd like to get on with life.