Much of the autodidactic approach I'm taking consists of osmosis. Continual exposure to educational material that is beyond ones grasp. That, paired witht he kind of willful libidinization I've been talking about, seems to work well as a self-guided approach.
One of the major hangups now, in terms of prototyping this praxis for other humans, is the disproportionate amount of free time I have. Much of that is clearly predicated on socio-economic privilege, but much of it goes beyond that and into the territory of, say, sacrificing social life to further the project, incurring manageable frugalities to incrrementally offset the financial demands of your lifestyle (and thus the time you need to spend earning money), etc.
Again, still very early in this, but there is still potential. If this is a project that will prove exclusive to some bourgeois stratum of society, then I'm inclined to embrace and further elaborate the prospects of a cognitariat vanguard, assuming it can endure sufficient auditing. If, on the other hand, this project can be programmatized into a less time-consuming commitment, then perhaps it can enjoy less exclusive class parameters.
One of the major things going for it is that it is conducive to the will to power, while not coming at the expense of an egalitarian sensibility. This can perhaps be used to siphon certain alt-right intensities, harnessing some portion of that mass libidinal phenomenon and channeling it, perhaps, toward the far-left. This particular effort would need to be transparent though, as far as I can tell.
The alt-left would need to market itself as an alternative to the established left. That said, the alt-left wouldn't be completely phobic to this or that neoliberal/liberal establishment - in fact it could even be in an intimate rapport with it.
Not sure if this would be the MO of the alt-left, or if the alt-left would play a supporting role to this larger movement, but the point of such a "larger movement" would be to converge communist interests with capitalist interests, in a manner that would make accelerationism seem a bit daft in hindsight.
Such a convergence may necessitate a deeply heterogeneous ideological composition. That is, an alt-left would need to be engineered to withstand the combustive potential of vast ideological difference, and to harness this combustion dialectically. I think we are already moving toward this with strains of the left today such as heterodox/dirtbag/etc, namely in that these figures exhibit a wider tolerance of differing voices in the conversation - which isn't to say they agree. In fact, its impressive precisely because they don't agree.
To be clear, I don't think the likes of Justin Murphy or Red Scare are doing what I;m talking about, just that they are individual exhbitions of a larger trajectory that may enter the territory of what I'm talking about. If this trajectory can be steered, than it must be.