Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
I think thats what initially attracted me to Nick Land and ccru, the intoxicating conceptual aesthetics inherited from D&G.
 

sus

Moderator
At the end of the day, millions of people spend hours "addicted" to 4chan, Reddit, YouTube, automobile boards, Discord, etc. If there was some special algorithmic dopamine-hacking magic that Facebook or Twitter found out, we'd expect those sites to be especially addictive. Ditto with notifications (cf @version on feedback) or social identity—millions of people waste their lives lurking Reddit and 4chan, never engaging, not even registering an account, etc.

At the end of the day, there's a much simpler explanation for why people find social media "addictive." People like consuming mindless entertainment. We've known this since radio, at least. If you wanna blame "algorithms" or "behavioral science harnessed," you need to make a strong comparative case between platforms, and I just don't see it.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
I can imagine you losing your phone one awful day, cancelling this, that and the other in a hurry, changing multiple passwords

and for what? addiction to convenience and you witter on like this isn't incentivised design burrowing into lives

at the end of the day is lazy English too, sort it out lad, you might not like the moon either but it's still out tonight
 

sus

Moderator
"At the end of the day" is an unassumingly beautiful phrase. The decision must be made by nightfall. We cannot go to sleep with conflict unresolved, our mind undecided. At the end, there is perspective, at the end, an opportunity for grace. Minevera's owl etc. We lay down our arms and set aside details. We zoom out. We focus on only the load-bearing, everything else blurs.
 

luka

Well-known member
At the risk of being a thermodynamic reductionist, the bottom line does seem to be the procurement of nutrients qua macromolecules from which energy, or molecules that aid in the system of deriving energy, is derived.
you can definitely say, as a reductionist, that the body is a tool for extracting energy from the environment.
 

luka

Well-known member
wash your hands has lost this argument comprehensively but that doesnt mean he's necessarily wrong it just means he didn't put forward any argument
 

luka

Well-known member
there are obviously open questions around for example, why we do things compulsively, why we do things that aren't 'good' for us, the extent to which we can distinguish between 'true' and 'false' needs, the extent to which we are manipulated, the extent to which that manipulation, if it exists, is conscious and derives from a sophisticated understanding of human psychology etc etc. all of this can be argued about and no conclusions will be drawn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

luka

Well-known member
Gus is obviously right that dopamine, as commonly used, is pseudoscience and just means pleasure, with pleasure understood as a chemical as opposed to a feeling but precisely nothing is gained by understanding pleasure as a chemical as opposed to a feeling
 

luka

Well-known member
are we manipulated into coordinating like ants to build this intergrated world-system which is nightmarish, banal, miraculous, vulgar, monumental, wasteful, violent, unjust, etc but which basically works, at least in the eyes of us lot, the fed, clothed and housed? or does it just happen? how am i supposed to know?
 
  • Love
Reactions: sus

luka

Well-known member
Never read D&G, gonna abstain til someone convinces me otherwise

My understanding is they're just Frenchified cybernetics, basically? So reading them in English is like a weird dark mirror lossy version of the original?
thats just one anglo thread they draw on but there are others, like for example Mcluhan, Castenada, Laing, Burroughs, basically the english language 60s LSD canon is what they are comprised of more than anything. mass market paperbacks.
 

luka

Well-known member
you can't overstate how backwards French culture was (and still is), so you're right in thinking they are just presenting that material to a home audience whereas we can go to the source
 
Top