Jordan Peterson thinks it makes sense to compare humans with lobsters

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
STILL all the knee-jerk responses about how he is a grifter or pointing out his cringe moments on twitter. Is that all the left can come up with? We have been waiting for years for some real critique now.

This just isn't remotely true, you clearly aren't familiar with his body of work, which is much more significant and larger than Dunham's (altho of course he has had many more decades to produce it). The meme JBP of the 2010s/20s is not the same JBP as the 80s/90s/00s theorist and lecturer, who wrote a lot and made non-trivial contributions to intellectual history

As a friend says, "The best argument for JBP's ideas are his Harvard lectures. The best argument against his ideas are his personal/family life."

On the one hand, I mean, the guy really is embarrassing himself, and he should've drifted off post-benzo incident. The apple cider stuff, the Lion diet, some of his motte-and-baileys re: transness/pronouns, it's all really embarrassing and discrediting and I sorta can't blame the left because it's such an easy target

On the other hand, none of that really matters, does it? The ideas are what count. Of course, this is how intellectual discussion always goes—each side picks the easiest targets, and ignores the hardest battles. It would be great if there was a discussion of substance about the relative merits of traditionalism & self-discipline vs progressivism and liberty, about when and to what extent these approaches are better or worse. (I can believe that the family structure dissolving might be a disaster, and also that I support legal marijuana & gay marriage.) The balance between order and disorder, structure and subversion, tradition and innovation—that's a tough dialectic, but maybe we can come up with good rules or heuristics for navigating when to favor one approach vs another.

And look, JBP's ideas—he's done a very good job (or did, back in 90s/00s) of synthesizing and interpreting a bunch of Biblical and art historical and literary ideas about tradition, duty, discipline, meaning, myth. His ideas aren't especially innovative, but (at peak form) he represents one of the best distillations and presentations of a set of lowercase-c conservative stances, and why they ought to be taken seriously.

Liberalism's never adequately dealt with these issues.

@linebaugh listen to these and get back to me



People forget—it is uncontroversial, i.e it has been widely testified to by tenured UToronto psychology professors—that Peterson was the most beloved professor they'd ever seen. That huge swathes of his classes—which were evenly split between men and women, lecturing on topics that had nothing to do with the current "address to men" incel shtick he's on—would break out in tears during his lectures, and write that JBP had changed the entire direction of their lives. I've heard interviews with members of that department who said it was "common knowledge" that Peterson was operating on a "different level" as an instructor—that his end-of-term evaluations were so consistently, overwhelmingly, unanimously glowing that it became a regular topic of gossip and fascination among other departmental instructors.

So, whatever embarrassments he's committed and been a part of in his 70s—and come on now, basically everyone is geriatric and confused by that age—he's an incredibly formidable thinker who cannot be easily dismissed.

I've personally invested, and am still investing, a lot of time into watching his taped lectures from these periods, and they are absolutely top-tier. There's a tremendous amount to be learned, not just from the content/ideas he's pushing, but about how he presents them, how he leads an audience through a story, how he speaks and pauses and emphasizes for effect.

He’s a god/christ pill doser, phenomenology of the Divine is ridiculous statement of bs and yeah I stuck at it because what’s lazier than an incomplete critique?

you can tell the bloke in the following story was a Jordan Peterson freak

 

version

Well-known member
I think at least part of the problem is that however good he was back in the day that isn't what's getting him attention today. What's getting him attention today is controversy and a sizable group of people feeling he's an opponent of the things which irritate them.

You can pull up his old lectures but how many are sitting through hours of that stuff and how many are just enjoying his tweets and clips pretending not to understand pronouns? That's where he is today and that's where the bulk of his audience is today. You can't ignore that in favour of pretending he never left the 90s. It'd be like pretending Nick Land died in 2003 because you like Fanged Noumena.
 

chava

Well-known member
There are other and perhaps more attractive options if you want "to own the libs" than Peterson. My sense is that most people go for the digested self-help stuff (the book and the inspirational YT videos with bad music) and that's fine.

I agree he should stay off twitter.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
He has a peculiar vocabulary even for a so-called academic

Only heard him and David Lynch say ‘golly’ as North Americans in the public domain but JP has a tendency to call kids ‘little monsters‘ a bit too often (I mean hate kids if you want but....), uses slightly incongruous but symbolically emotive terms eg ‘bloody’, he’d be a good word map candidate
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
He has a peculiar vocabulary even for a so-called academic

Only heard him and David Lynch say ‘golly’ as North Americans in the public domain but JP has a tendency to call kids ‘little monsters‘ a bit too often (I mean hate kids if you want but....), uses slightly incongruous but symbolically emotive terms eg ‘bloody’, he’d be a good word map candidate
"So-called" academic - it's almost as if the gestures libs make to shore up the symbolic order are at bottom solely expedient
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
he’s a bellend

fuckin waistcoat and pocket watch, I mean look smart if when its called for but his image is deeply controlled these days, I save my own dapper moves for weddings and bar mitzvahs

you know at times mid sentence he’s thinking about the sweet hit of 50mgs of diazepam, images of his daughter in bikinis and swimwear flash in front of his eyes and then he starts crying about Twitter

he could’ve called Elon out. I’d pay top £ to see that debate descend into a fist fight
 

sus

Moderator
I've only seen his first Harvard lecture (the one you linked). His UoTs lectures before he got infamous are excellent as well. I mean even if you disagree about everything he is saying at least you can acknowledge his talent as a teacher.

He is a complicated fellow that's for sure. In one of the docs he tells how as a teen he envisioned his statesman-like funeral (he mentioned Robert Kennedy). So I am pretty sure a great deal of his warnings of totalitarianism, narcissism even schizophrenia are directed at himself. As any proper psychologist of course should do.
I've heard rumors for multiple semi-reputable sources that he believes God has chosen him as a prophet. How metaphorical this is, unclear.
 

sus

Moderator
I think at least part of the problem is that however good he was back in the day that isn't what's getting him attention today. What's getting him attention today is controversy and a sizable group of people feeling he's an opponent of the things which irritate them.

You can pull up his old lectures but how many are sitting through hours of that stuff and how many are just enjoying his tweets and clips pretending not to understand pronouns? That's where he is today and that's where the bulk of his audience is today. You can't ignore that in favour of pretending he never left the 90s. It'd be like pretending Nick Land died in 2003 because you like Fanged Noumena.
Training machines are brutal things, powered by ego appeals and shame. "The algorithm picked him up and spat him out."
 

pattycakes_

Can turn naughty
I got a lot out of the maps of meaning lecture series. Not sure when they're from but definitely before the controversy period. A lot of it was new info to me that could have been found elsewhere but whatevs, he curated a good selection of directions that I can now go and do my own checking out of. And credit's due in that he broke down some fairly complex stuff in a way a non scholar such as me could digest. Particularly thankful for him putting me onto loads of Jung.

He was the spark that got me listening to academic stuff. I used to be a massive podcast head. Thousands of hours. But since JP they've been replaced by lectures etc. So that's cool.. But, I don't see me going back to him anymore. Especially not his latest incarnation. It's beyond self parody at this point. Lost the plot. He's not cut out for the position he's got himself into. It's obviously taken a huge toll and no doubt he will keep doubling down on those petty points forever to keep face, which will of course continue to attract plenty of support from all the wrong people. I can only see it getting worse from here. Dude should hit the showers for like 3 years, maybe take some plant medicine, which he's shown interest in, and see how he feels about it all after that.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sus

chava

Well-known member
What is the recent controversy everybody is so riled up about? Is it the Swimsuit issue thing?
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
podcasting / youtube / that kind of ideas-based internet fame seems to chew people up and spit them out in a parallel way to how the music world did the same to musicians in the 90s
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

wild greens

Well-known member
Living in London i often wondered what lurked in the Thames, you would see oddball lads fishing near the Thames Barrier when I lived in Charlton, but no traps in South-East; at least where I lived anyway. We did find a few lads a further down the stream who were trapping for crayfish, though.

Half-arsed research led us to the National Institute of Crayfish Trappers (NCIT), (Later featured in the Grauniad), and their ventures into trapping in waterways up and down the country.

Why crayfish, I hear you ask. In the 70s, the UK government introduced the American Signal crayfish to UK waterways, ostensibly to sell to the Norwegians, whose economy was booming at the time. If research had been carried out properly, they'd have found out the American Signal carried a crayfish plague, which wiped out most of the native population. American Signal had an inbuilt herd immunity.

Like most hairbrained government schemes of their ilk, it was quietly mothballed and after a day or two's desultory press, forgotten. Meanwhile, the American signal was causing havoc in the waterways and wiping out all kinds of species by shoving its knob about and causing an imbalance to native UK species. There is a DEFRA report, if you want to read it

The NCIT is mostly a labour of love from a lad called Crayfish Bob, but he's done well out of it I believe - the American Signal has a much more delicate taste than most of the chinese farm-produced stuff. You can get hold of some mitten crabs in the Thames too, though I'd be loate to eat much from some of the stretches of that water now.

Particularly round the Greenwich peninsula, there's a lot of TPH in the soil from the old refinery that would no doubt cause some problems, however slight.

The lobsters remain a more obscure challenge around London waterways and I dont really have the time or werewithal these days to look into it much. I did hear of a few lads trapping in West London years ago but i think there was only a smattering there

Perhaps for the southern trapper, heading towards the far coast is the answer. On a clear day you could see France in the distance, of course
 

wild greens

Well-known member
Out towards West London and beyond, of course, there are little "jewel"-like islands in the Thames. Some, like Ham Island or Monkey Island, are largely man-made and populated by hotels or family- inherited eccentrics. Apparently Monkey Island is quite high-end these days?

Then you have the likes of Sheppey or Canvey, which are filled with a populous one may not with to consort with on a regular basis

It is little known, however, that the invasive Mitten Crabs have made some of these islands their own. Chiswick Eyot, an uninhabitable couple of acres that has been designated by Hounslow Council as a nature reserve, has been largely colonised by the Chinese crab species. The crabs’ burrowing loosens the mud around the island and when the tide flows in and out, the earth is washed away, steadily eroding the island over time.

Thus the Eyot is shrinking and may well disappear entirely unless the issue is eventually resolved
 
Top