Search results

https://www.horizonsmusic.co.uk/products/artist-unknown-jps-myspace-beats digitally?

vimeo.com/67720190

Do you? Why is that? More than other people or just me? Guess how much I don’t want to hear an answer because. Please let me know how to get kicked off this site and decommissioned or find the unsubscribe button. Great.

Or maybe your jokes are not funny thus being a “humorless automaton” would be yet another subjective opinion you consider a universalism

Moron: https://www.diversitycenterneo.org/about-us/pronouns/

You sound like boris johnson gov website. And with your other comment. “What you need to know.” “What you need to do”. So does idle rich issuing orders and monorail appraisals

🙄

Actually I don’t

🥊 is that a promise. I can start now, I can make up anything

Only if you say it in a more condescending manner like this guy: Or as PASTICHED here

Things have to be conceptually interesting also

I do not get your concept. Only certain people think Kane is a good film, certain dominants who also reflect the story itself - that is my point. You don’t get my concept which would talk about colonizer settler white patriarchy extraction industries moving people off their land and white male...

Are you in LA still?

Thanks… but @woops - am still none the wiser in this context

Wow that’s intense. Whereabouts?

What is screenplay coverage?

presumably uncredited?

What? - already stated I disagree with the ubiquitous appraisal of Citizen Kane, many do…& dislike the film a lot - one reason why is the very reason you have told me it is proliferated as THE thing - by certain sectors who claim dominance in a certain area of filmmaking and film history. Anyhow...

I don’t understand your sentence, can you say it in easier words or more words?

Yes it is used to describe a work of cinematic quality - is that what you mean?