Meanwhile, Biden's team are hiding him away until Thursday's debate. He's not loving it.
Trump
- Thread starter Leo
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #mentoo craner had sex with a girl craner saw a girl naked crooked luka everyone has dickpicks of everyone grab them by the sufi hashtag jurisdiction hashtag witchhunts now impeach johnson ffs obsessive male feminists office romance or sexual harassment? parp pfft! poot! release the leo tapes! so much winning squirt tea fancies donald that's a lovely dress the j stands for genius trump le monde what about the snowflakes white men fight back
Meanwhile, Biden's team are hiding him away until Thursday's debate. He's not loving it.
padraig (u.s.)
a monkey that will go ape
100%. it's the boy who cried email wolf.
Trump's people saw which the way wind was blowing after the debate, someone decided to throw this shit at the wall to see if it would stick
it almost definitely won't, as everyone as said minds are made up at this point
I guess there's a small, bitter joy in knowing it will fail specifically because of the intense partisan divide Trump et al did so much to help create
that they brought in the long and acrimoniously ousted Bannon to do the hit speaks volumes tho. all hands on deck.
IdleRich
IdleRich
Probably cos with the level of debate we have now that's more effective.
padraig (u.s.)
a monkey that will go ape
I know you're just parroting a right-wing talking point whenever you bring up this nonsense
but not for the first time, please, show any kind of evidence
also, genuine question - how do you square being 100% libertarian blockchain smaller govt is better etc with being an ardent supporter of an authoritarian kleptocrat who's done nothing to make govt smaller and everything to promote business as usual in re cronyism etc
unless the answer is an accelerationist type "everything must get worse to get better" deal, it is truly bizarre
IdleRich
IdleRich
I get the feeling that it will be Trump trying to reverse results. Obviously Biden is more popular (as was Clinton) but with enough suppression, intimidation and recounts it could be made closer.
Yeah. It's not emails though is it? It's 3 hard drives full of filth, corruption and depravity. Plus an incarcerated business associate's Gmail login.
Wrong, wrong, and thrice wrong
I'm leaning more towards no government, bitcoin, wild buffalo gigaherd restoration and homestead maximalist, with an eye on expansion into space.
IdleRich
IdleRich
I agree it's not emails part 2, that was when they released the emails again last week.
But am I missing something, this (completely unsubstantiated) stuff is related to the candidate's son not the candidate himself isn't it?
It's about "big guy" and his off the books meetings with senior Chinese figures, and Ukraine shenanigans, arranged by hunter, for cash and equity.
padraig (u.s.)
a monkey that will go ape
cool answer
and yes I was aware of yr goals
how exactly, again, does your Trump boosterism get you to any of those things
unless again, it's an acceleration deal (or, you think you can somehow get in on that cronyism)
if you said a pox on both their houses, then sure. but you just prefer an even shittier version of normal big govt.
not that I'm gonna pursue it after cos who really cares but it's an interesting incoherency
padraig (u.s.)
a monkey that will go ape
boss, keep in mind this is a guy who regularly says things like the Democratic Party actively controls BLM street warriors
padraig (u.s.)
a monkey that will go ape
defending the Democratic Party because the alternative is somehow worse is one of the most wearying of all the many wearying things about election cycles
Leo
Well-known member
IdleRich
IdleRich
This seems like good news right? https://uk.news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-pennsylvania-mail-in-voting-232929493.html
IdleRich
IdleRich
No-one interested in this? The main analysis seems to be that a) it's good that mail-in votes posted in time will be counted (unless there is some kind of appeal type thing) in this case... but b) it's terrifying that four judges voted to restrict voting rights, especially as there will be another one of their ilk appointed very soon.
Leo
Well-known member
conservative justices on the court will proclaim it's not that they personally are for or against XYZ, it's that the constitution or the way a law is written does not allow or forbid something. in other words, it's not that they are against extending time to count mail-in ballots, it's that states don't have the authority to make that decision.
liberal judges do the same thing, tbf.
liberal judges do the same thing, tbf.
Last edited: