Trump
- Thread starter Leo
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #mentoo craner had sex with a girl craner saw a girl naked crooked luka everyone has dickpicks of everyone grab them by the sufi hashtag jurisdiction hashtag witchhunts now impeach johnson ffs obsessive male feminists office romance or sexual harassment? parp pfft! poot! release the leo tapes! so much winning squirt tea fancies donald that's a lovely dress the j stands for genius trump le monde what about the snowflakes white men fight back
IdleRich
IdleRich
Yeah yeah I agree.
But do you agree about the libel cases? I just don't see what possible defence they have; they loudly and repeatedly told insane and damaging lies about these companies, what are they gonna say? I guess they don't have billions to pay up but they're gonna get bumfucked aren't they?
But do you agree about the libel cases? I just don't see what possible defence they have; they loudly and repeatedly told insane and damaging lies about these companies, what are they gonna say? I guess they don't have billions to pay up but they're gonna get bumfucked aren't they?
IdleRich
IdleRich
I think it's possible that, despite all their bravado, they will at the last minute agree to put out an incredibly servile and apologetic statement admitting that every single thing they said was an enormous lie with absolutely no grounding in fact.... the thing is MAGA won't believe that it's real so the damage is done so why should Dominion accept that?
IdleRich
IdleRich
Which is the crux of the matter of course; MAGA will believe anything, no matter how crazy, as long as it points to Trump being the victor.... while on the other hand even if the same people who told them that crazy retract their lies or whatever or say something about how actually Trump didn't win, then they automatically become a liar traitor deep state scumbag. It's a very selective one-way madness, like a tube with valves that only let the crazy (and true for that matter) go in one direction. What can be done with these people?
Leo
Well-known member
many of them can never be convinced, will just dig their heels in deeper.
but maybe there is hope for some people: Local Oath Keepers split from national following Jan. 6
but maybe there is hope for some people: Local Oath Keepers split from national following Jan. 6
craner
Beast of Burden
Lin Wood went further than all of them though. On his Twitter account before Jan 6 he was sending out increasingly deranged tweets saying that John Roberts was a pedophile and murderer, Mike Pence should be executed by firing squad and (somehow connected to all of his) Jeffrey Epstein was still secretively alive. I don't know anything about legal matters, but surely making those sorts of claims publicly would have consequences for his professional prospects.
Let me assure you that I don't give this stuff any attention outside the time I spend trolling on here
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
IdleRich
IdleRich
No of course, you just came up with the same arguments and talking points as Q-anon by complete coincidence. That makes sense.
IdleRich
IdleRich
Yes I think so. I believe that in one state they withdrew which means he can't practise law there, but there is also a motion to disbar him (and Sidney too I think) though whether or not that will come to anything who knows. You'd think Roberts might want to sue for those statements but I guess he's rising above it - which in my view is a big mistake, if you don't slap 'em down and stamp on them immediately they keep coming.
Leo
Well-known member
I actually believe that, but won't let it spoil our back and forth. I sense you're a bit more committed to what you say on the Wuhan thread, though.
IdleRich
IdleRich
I think that if someone publicly insists you are a paedophile you have the right to take all action available to you. He could have legal recourse and he doesn't take it so what message does that send? For one thing it means Wood will say more crazy stuff and probably others will repeat it and say other stuff about other people too. Also, that guy Noel Castler often insists that Trump was an adderall addict when they worked on the Apprentice together, he also says that he used to shit himself regularly and makes countless other claims about the casual racism and horrible behaviour of the whole Trump clan - and a big part of his thing is saying that Trump doesn't sue him cos it's all true... so can Wood make that argument too?
Leo
Well-known member
in the case of Chief Justice Roberts, my guess is he doesn't do anything because it's so clear to everyone that wood's got mental issues and no one takes him seriously. not that it makes it ok to say that sort of stuff, but would be like suing a slow child for being naughty.
craner
Beast of Burden
In the minds of these people, it becomes the fact that he doesn't want to sue Wood because he knows that Wood has the goods. Do you remember that whole thing where Wood was talking about some encrypted computer files he had. "I have the password!" he said. "Should anything happen to me you can find the password for the encrypted files showing the rape on Peado Island in the top left hand drawer of my mahogany desk!" Sometimes I feel like I hallucinated this whole episode, it was so weird.