Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
A corporatization of post structural theory. I’d be interested in a Deleuzian hedge fund strategy, get those old boys scratching their heads. An ETF-without-organs!Is this what Americans do to Deleuze and Guattari?
A corporatization of post structural theory. I’d be interested in a Deleuzian hedge fund strategy, get those old boys scratching their heads. An ETF-without-organs!Is this what Americans do to Deleuze and Guattari?
You all have, and your influences have been immortalized in the archives.we can help you dematerialise your personal brand.
I’m sure I still have loads left to appreciate about D&G, but ultimately I’d rather do my own thinking.Is this what Americans do to Deleuze and Guattari?
Wow! What a sinister agendaI’m not so much interested in acquiring assets personally. I am interested in the process of acquiring assets
I’m not so much interested in acquiring assets personally. I am interested in the process of acquiring assets
But again I think this stuff needs to be utilized, I just have no need for it. Hence why I’d rather be acquiring on behalf of a public agency or maybe a private social enterprise, something that can administer the realization of the value that I don’t need to personally realize."mysterious squillionaire stan menic is said to have no interest in the squillions he already owns - only in acquiring more"
I’m sure there is nuance to embodied capital, e.g. empty penthouses, that I am missing here, but that is beside the point.But I don’t want the state to subsume the private sector, I just think I can learn to help the government in the capacity of a cybernetic troubleshooter and a financial strategist. I have no use of a Lamborghini or a yacht unless I’m trying to embody capital to evade taxes, which wouldn’t even be a problem, i.e capital leakage, if I am already acquiring on behalf of the public bodies doing the taxation.
sooner or later you will realise the only option is to slaughter them like pigs.Ideally I’d prefer not to alienate the incumbent elites and incur such massive political liabilities, but I’m not sure how to reconcile that liability-aversion and pragmatism with the progressive impetus I claim to abide by, i.e. more free time for more people.