sus

Moderator
The flattening of everything runs counter to the stated aim of diversity too, reducing hundreds of cultures to simply "people of color", for example.
Yeah, I think the irony is that these same groups are doing a top-down cultural imposition, from sheltered positions on the coasts onto far-away locales in a way that can be fairly called "colonialism."
 

sus

Moderator
The flattening of everything runs counter to the stated aim of diversity too, reducing hundreds of cultures to simply "people of color", for example.
Not to mention the treatment of cultural and racial groups as ideologically homogenous—the censoring of controversies within these groups as either "Uncle Tom"-ing, false consciousness, internalized -isms, etc.
 

sus

Moderator
They respect marginalized peoples so much they dismiss huge swathes of them as "confused" or "self-hating" because they don't support cultural leftism.
 

linebaugh

Well-known member
a tiki bar rebranded in my neighborhood because they thought 'tiki' is offensive. and maybe it is but theres absolutely no way they came to that conclusion from outrage of the local midwestern Polynesian population
 

sus

Moderator
True every name is issued from a certain gaze, but we do also have to reckon with data capture and expressing qualities in quantifiable and non-tedious ways.
I do like the concept of re-organizing racial categories in a consequentialist way, where race purely matters from a perspective of how others treat you. There's hints of this—passing privilege, light-skinned privilege. But at the same time, TBH, I think discourse at large has preserved an essentialist view of race, bordering on "one-drop" theory, instead of this more pragmatic frame.
 

sus

Moderator
theres probably a bit of that but I think generally the misguided cultural leftism comes more from just a lack of consideration.
Sure, but is a lack of respect, and a lack of consideration, all that different?

In other words, are choices made, and opinions heard, on the actual basis of wanting to respect, & listen to, & incorporate into decision-making, the "lived experiences" of all POCs? (Protected Organizing Caucuses) Or are the pro-police views of many African-Americans actually just... inconvenient, so they're "aren't considered"?
 

sus

Moderator
I do like the concept of re-organizing racial categories in a consequentialist way, where race purely matters from a perspective of how others treat you. There's hints of this—passing privilege, light-skinned privilege. But at the same time, TBH, I think discourse at large has preserved an essentialist view of race, bordering on "one-drop" theory, instead of this more pragmatic frame.
You see this e.g. in people who have zero connection to their """"home"""" country/continent suddenly appropriating its culture.

E.g. someone who was born in America, speaks zero Hindi, grew up among secular Western parents who were second-generation themselves, suddenly choosing to craft their entire identity around this pre-colonial culture that they "own." Dress, iconography, symbols, music.

If you remove the essentialism, and think in terms of cultures, instead of culturally constructed "races," this is really, really silly. This person has no actual connection to India. From a pragmatic perspective, their "race" basically amounts to being a little more dark-skinned than average, and potentially seeing some minor prejudice as a result.

And look, "racial pride" is a reasonable coping strategy when you're being shit on constantly for your race. It just isn't a productive one, insofar as it doubles down on the racial essentializing.
 

version

Well-known member
Not to mention the treatment of cultural and racial groups as ideologically homogenous—the censoring of controversies within these groups as either "Uncle Tom"-ing, false consciousness, internalized -isms, etc.
They're still struggling to square their hostility to "The Unvaccinated", who they view as stereotypical Trump supporters/right wingers it's fine to hate and abuse, and stories like this,
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
I do like the concept of re-organizing racial categories in a consequentialist way, where race purely matters from a perspective of how others treat you. There's hints of this—passing privilege, light-skinned privilege. But at the same time, TBH, I think discourse at large has preserved an essentialist view of race, bordering on "one-drop" theory, instead of this more pragmatic frame.
Yeah it seems basis of the “way people treat you” is tough to reconcile with the basis of genetics/phenotypes/appaearances, and really much of this just seems like an effort to theorize away any trace of social roughness.

Personally, as far as social progress is concerned, I’d rather examine and update procedural standards and shift microeconomic incentives via policy. That said, I have a very unclear image of the system as it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

sus

Moderator
THAT SAID

I am all for supporting cultural preservation, diverse aesthetics, cosmologies, religious and iconographic systems, etc.

From the POV that these folks are, in fact, preserving and disseminating these cultures—all for it.

It's just this implicit "one-drop" ethos underlying it, and which gate-keeps who "is allowed" to preserve these cultures, that grates.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
They're still struggling to square their hostility to "The Unvaccinated", who they view as stereotypical Trump supporters/right wingers it's fine to hate and abuse, and stories like this,
A crucial difference there is that black people actually have pretty good reasons to be suspicious of the medical establishment as a whole.
 

linebaugh

Well-known member
Sure, but is a lack of respect, and a lack of consideration, all that different?

In other words, are choices made, and opinions heard, on the actual basis of wanting to respect, & listen to, & incorporate into decision-making, the "lived experiences" of all POCs? (Protected Organizing Caucuses) Or are the pro-police views of many African-Americans actually just... inconvenient, so they're "aren't considered"?
youre right but I was referring more to the 'oh they just dont know whats best for them/must be self hating' justification, which is in itself a kind of consideration. not that that isnt a factor but I dont think its the primary drive. its all a very abstract/hypothetical game without any stable referent I think
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

linebaugh

Well-known member
A crucial difference there is that black people actually have pretty good reasons to be suspicious of the medical establishment as a whole.
gun-bullet.gif

gus reading this
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sus

version

Well-known member
You see this e.g. in people who have zero connection to their """"home"""" country/continent suddenly appropriating its culture.

E.g. someone who was born in America, speaks zero Hindi, grew up among secular Western parents who were second-generation themselves, suddenly choosing to craft their entire identity around this pre-colonial culture that they "own." Dress, iconography, symbols, music.
I think this is also because a lot of liberals seem to think in terms of property and transactions.
 

version

Well-known member
A crucial difference there is that black people actually have pretty good reasons to be suspicious of the medical establishment as a whole.
Yeah, but the point is it's difficult to make that argument whilst also claiming anyone apprehensive about the vaccine is evil/stupid/deserves to die and should be forced to take it or be treated as a second-class citizen.
 
Top