Status
Not open for further replies.

IdleRich

IdleRich
But what were they saying before? That an earlier lockdown would have saved 20k covid deaths and made an earlier release from lockdown possible, thus reducing the above deaths that MAY be attributed indirectly to lockdown.
 
How bad is covid really?
A hospital doctor in Sweden writes


I am not denying that covid is awful for the people who do get really sick or for the families of the people who die, just as it is awful for the families of people who die of cancer, or influenza, or an opioid overdose. But the size of the response in most of the world (not including Sweden) has been totally disproportionate to the size of the threat.

Sweden ripped the metaphorical band-aid off quickly and got the epidemic over and done with in a short amount of time, while the rest of the world has chosen to try to peel the band-aid off slowly. At present that means Sweden has one of the highest total death rates in the world. But covid is over in Sweden. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected any more. I am willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. If that is the case, then there won’t have been any point in shutting down in the first place, because all those countries are going to end up with the same number of dead at the end of the day anyway. Shutting down completely in order to decrease the total number of deaths only makes sense if you are willing to stay shut down until a vaccine is available. That could take years. No country is willing to wait that long
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
How bad is covid really?
A hospital doctor in Sweden writes


I am not denying that covid is awful for the people who do get really sick or for the families of the people who die, just as it is awful for the families of people who die of cancer, or influenza, or an opioid overdose. But the size of the response in most of the world (not including Sweden) has been totally disproportionate to the size of the threat.

Sweden ripped the metaphorical band-aid off quickly and got the epidemic over and done with in a short amount of time, while the rest of the world has chosen to try to peel the band-aid off slowly. At present that means Sweden has one of the highest total death rates in the world. But covid is over in Sweden. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected any more. I am willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. If that is the case, then there won’t have been any point in shutting down in the first place, because all those countries are going to end up with the same number of dead at the end of the day anyway. Shutting down completely in order to decrease the total number of deaths only makes sense if you are willing to stay shut down until a vaccine is available. That could take years. No country is willing to wait that long
New Zealand lifted its lockdown two months ago today after a grand total of 22 deaths. Since then they've averaged about one new case per day. They've beaten it.

I honestly don't understand why some people are saying "we're all going to get it eventually" when I've never heard anyone saying this about any other infectious disease. They didn't say that about SARS-cov-1, which is more infectious than SARS-cov-2.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
NZ are going to have plan their reintegration with the rest of the world very carefully, athough they do have the advantage of being very difficult to visit without an invite.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
But what were they saying before? That an earlier lockdown would have saved 20k covid deaths and made an earlier release from lockdown possible, thus reducing the above deaths that MAY be attributed indirectly to lockdown.

I think we locked down late enough for the virus to then approach herd immunity anyway. If we had locked down early, we would be experiencing this sort of thing now, as we open up (by necessity):

Rom.jpg
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
NZ are going to have plan their reintegration with the rest of the world very carefully, athough they do have the advantage of being very difficult to visit without an invite.
I'd say if that's the worst aspect of this from their perspective then they've done fine.
 
New Zealand lifted its lockdown two months ago today after a grand total of 22 deaths. Since then they've averaged about one new case per day. They've beaten it.

I honestly don't understand why some people are saying "we're all going to get it eventually" when I've never heard anyone saying this about any other infectious disease. They didn't say that about SARS-cov-1, which is more infectious than SARS-cov-2.

We already know that close to the majority of people who get it are asymptomatic. It only gets to work on people who are both receptive to it and already on a slippery slope, fitness-wise. It gives them a push towards the exit. But not in greater numbers than anything else we've seen, even in living memory - 1957, 1968, 2009.

I'm coming around to the idea that the whole thing has been used as an excuse for centralised States and their bosses to re-assert their control. Spicy scare stories about strokes, long-term effects, kawasaki, etc scare people, the news equivalents of the protein spikes on SARS-CoV-2's shell to force entry into an otherwise blasé population's consciousness. "Shit, this one is different! Not only deadly, but nasty!".
 

woops

is not like other people
Oh god, I'm having a flashback to fucking Voodoo Glow Skulls and all the rest of that diabolical Californian pop-ska-punk that loads of people I went to school with loved to bits.
so you do have some musical taste after all?
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
NZ are going to have plan their reintegration with the rest of the world very carefully, athough they do have the advantage of being very difficult to visit without an invite.
They're an island nation. We're an island nation. We were never in the Schengen area and we're not even in the EU any more. A failure to stop people visiting early on in the pandemic, especially from China, Italy and Spain, is one of the more obvious of this government's many, many fuck-ups.
 
They're an island nation. We're an island nation. We were never in the Schengen area and we're not even in the EU any more. A failure to stop people visiting early on in the pandemic, especially from China, Italy and Spain, is one of the more obvious of this government's many, many fuck-ups.

Should have stuck with herd immunity from the start, as for every other virus, with shielding for the old and sick while the rest of us carried on as normal. Cowardice has cost everywhere except Sweden very dear (yes, I know their economy tanked by 8%, but they're a player in the world economy that has tanked by 2 to 4 times that).

NZ will get their fair share eventually unless they lock down until there's a vaccine. But theres never been a durable coronavirus vaccine.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
They're an island nation. We're an island nation. We were never in the Schengen area and we're not even in the EU any more. A failure to stop people visiting early on in the pandemic, especially from China, Italy and Spain, is one of the more obvious of this government's many, many fuck-ups.

It was probably quite widespread by end January already - eradication would have been impossible. SAGE advised against blocking incoming flights.

The biggest f-up was on the WHO's part, in not isolating China.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Should have stuck with herd immunity from the start, as for every other virus, with shielding for the old and sick while the rest of us carried on as normal.
You.
Don't.
Need.
To.
Be.
Old.
Or.
Sick.
To.
Get.
Fucked.
Up.
By.
SARS-CoV-2.

head_on_desk.gif

People much younger than you, with no previous major illnesses, have caught this bug back in the spring and are still suffering from major health problems from which they may never recover. I'm getting extremely tired of this bullshit macho attitude of "If I caught it, I'd be laid up with the sniffles for a couple of days, fight it off with hot toddies and then I'd be right as rain." Until you've caught it, you have no idea how badly, or for how long, it's going to affect you. Clearly you get a buzz out of saying "I'm not scared". Well, I am. Lifelong cognitive impairment and reduced heart, lung and liver function? No fucking thanks.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Right-wingers are now sharing this article about all the stuff did to fight the Coronavirus early - in-between golfing, holding rallies and denying that it would have any serious effect - and which the LAMEstream media didn't report.


Really made me laugh quite a lot, things such as this massively important development which I'm surprised didn't stop C19 in its tracks right then
Feb 4: FDA issued an emergency use authorization for the CDC diagnostic.
Difficult for me to give too much credit to Trump for simply being president at the time it happened though. Clutching at straws to an embarrassing extent.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Lifelong cognitive impairment and reduced heart, lung and liver function? No fucking thanks.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a coronavirus that emerged in 2003, causes very similar symptoms to COVID-19. As with COVID-19, people over 60 years are at highest risk of severe symptoms.

A study of the long-term effects of SARS undertaken in Hong Kong showed that two years after they had the disease, one in two SARS survivors had much poorer exercise capacity and health status than those who had never had the disease. Only 78% of SARS patients were able to return to full‐time work 1 year after infection.

Another study, also done in Hong Kong, revealed that 40% of people recovering from SARS still had chronic fatigue symptoms 3.5 years after being diagnosed. Viral infections such as SARS and Epstein-Barr virus are known to trigger chronic fatigue syndrome that can last for months or years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top