Status
Not open for further replies.

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
He wanted to use the previous provision of three jabs rather than the combined vaccine, which makes him a triple-vaxxer and paragon of modern virtue.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
It is strange that they fought a big battle over whether to administer three vaccines in one or separately, as if it really mattered.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
You've made another logical mistake, @Mr. Tea: if someone disapproves of a subset of a set, then they disapprove of every element of that set doesn't follow.
I dunno what you think you're achieving with these constant, spurious appeals to "logic". You don't see anyone with a placard saying "Down with the MMR vaccine!!! (the other ones are OK tho)". The movement is characterized by a non-specific opposition to vaccines, and often to other forms of medicine too.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
He specifically wanted to roll back from the MMR to the three separate vaccines; he was a hyper-vaxxer and respecter of the purity of the monovax.

Anyway, you're moving the goalposts now as you started off with Wakefield and are now busy constructing some sort of strawperson.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
We've now reached the stage where your arguments depend solely on pretending words mean what you want rather than anything like the way they are commonly understood.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
You can't just restrict the term 'anti-vax' to 'being against a vaccine for the wrong reasons' as partial or whole anti-vaxxers think they're against vaccines for the right reasons.

By your logic, someone against the AZ vaccine before countries started dropping it left, right and centre would have been 'anti-vax' before but not after. :ROFLMAO:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top