Wuhan Killer Sneeze (thanks Tea)

Status
Not open for further replies.
mixed_biscuits

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
The problem is that the definition of 'reasonable' is precisely what's up for debate.

By your criterion, if 83% of Japan thinks vaccines are not sufficiently safe then either the safety criteria used are actually fine and they're anti-vaxxers or they're not and they're not.

Fair enough, but that's a heck of a lot of people who are supposedly wrong about something they've largely experienced directly.
 
Last edited:
mixed_biscuits

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
When you go to the doctor and the doctor asks you how you're feeling, he's depending on an argumentum ad populum with sample size 1 ;)

Presumably they're not happy with their safety because of personal medical experience.
 
Mr. Tea

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
mixed_biscuits said:
Presumably they're not happy with their safety because of personal medical experience.
Click to expand...
Which is horseshit, because rates of severe adverse reactions to vaccines are very low. They wouldn't be licenced for use otherwise.

Are you next going to tell me that mediaeval people hanged "witches" because they had personal experiences of being cursed?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top