DannyL

Wild Horses
1) Nothing Starmer does will ever be good, ever, in the eyes of Corbyn supporters.
2) Leads in polling of under 5% can pretty much be ignored as random statistical fluctuation. What you're is sustained leads heading up to 10+ or more. I don't think he's achieved that yet?
3) As "Prime Minister material" in polling (I can't remember how they phrase it) he's streets ahead of the others atm. Personal popularity is fairly decent iirc. I don't know if this will translate into electoral gains.
 

version

Well-known member
Labour open up four-point polling lead over the government:

"Because we believe in it, though, polling tends to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, particularly on social media – where each new poll is eagerly shared by supporters of whichever party appears to be surging this week. Like older forms of divination, the numbers give form to our desires and fears. They authorise our beliefs, legitimise our candidates and generate little waves of excitement. They allow us to blow attention bubbles around issues or parties, boosting the ratings further, and spawning yet another squee of excitement and feverish sharing of numbers. In moments of crisis, this can even allow small parties to game the system and generate attention and support as if from nowhere. If it weren’t for this, it is difficult to see how the Brexit party, a corporation with no members and a relatively small budget, could have won the European elections in May."
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
1) Nothing Starmer does will ever be good, ever, in the eyes of Corbyn supporters.
2) Leads in polling of under 5% can pretty much be ignored as random statistical fluctuation. What you're is sustained leads heading up to 10+ or more. I don't think he's achieved that yet?
3) As "Prime Minister material" in polling (I can't remember how they phrase it) he's streets ahead of the others atm. Personal popularity is fairly decent iirc. I don't know if this will translate into electoral gains.
Yeah, I didn't mean to imply that an apparent 4% poll lead means Labour would definitely smash it if an election were to be held tomorrow. But even if the two main parties are polling about even, that's a damn sight different from Labour trailing by 22 points as it was just before Starmer took over, which is not in the noise.

votingintention.jpg
 

boxedjoy

Well-known member
maybe Corbyn wouldn't be any further ahead in the polls but Starmer should be trouncing them. Remember when this started and the Gov't was hoping for 20k deaths maximum and now we are over 100k? Because it seems Starmer doesn't and that's exactly the type of thing that should be getting hammered into the brain of every person eligible to vote - that this Gov't is literally getting away with murder and even if you agree with the ideology (ugh) the competency isn't there.
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
maybe Corbyn wouldn't be any further ahead in the polls but Starmer should be trouncing them. Remember when this started and the Gov't was hoping for 20k deaths maximum and now we are over 100k? Because it seems Starmer doesn't and that's exactly the type of thing that should be getting hammered into the brain of every person eligible to vote - that this Gov't is literally getting away with murder and even if you agree with the ideology (ugh) the competency isn't there.
I'd be interested in seeing any commentary as to why this is so. I assume it's some kinda cynical focused group exercise - what resonates with the voters they're aiming for or whatever. When I say I'd be interested in seeing commentary, I mean thoughtful pieces, not STARMER RED TORY CUNT KILL HIM WANKER obvs. Seems odd to me.
 

john eden

male pale and stale
Hi @DannyL

Today I am interested in why opposing the first reading of the spycops bill would have been posturing but the non-binding vote last night about Universal Credit was not posturing?
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
Idk mate. I haven't read owt about the Universal Credit bill. I think not opposing the Spycops bill was bad btw, and I clearly got it wrong re. the hoped for amendments.
 

john eden

male pale and stale
Idk mate. I haven't read owt about the Universal Credit bill. I think not opposing the Spycops bill was bad btw, and I clearly got it wrong re. the hoped for amendments.
Fair do's - I was just needling you for lols, which isn't very productive. Hope you are good.
 

version

Well-known member
The UK Labour Party has hired a former Israeli spy to help manage its social media, The Electronic Intifada can reveal.

Assaf Kaplan will work in the office of Labour leader Keir Starmer, a source with knowledge of the hire said. Kaplan was in Israeli military intelligence for nearly five years, an officer in Unit 8200, its cyberwarfare branch.

Unit 8200 specializes in spying, hacking and encryption. It carries out blackmail, mass surveillance and systematic discrimination against Palestinians. In 2014, a group of whistleblowers detailed how the unit spies on Palestinian civilians living under Israeli military occupation.
 

DannyL

Wild Horses
Dude.

Asa Winstanley found that out from looking at the dude's fucking LinkedIn profile. If he was an Israeli intelligence asset, do you think it would be announced to the world in this way.? The inference is that Starmer's Labour is in the pocket of Israel. I guess these people can't help themselves at this stage but it's yet more Jews behind the scenes, pulling secret strings fantasy fiction. Depressing.
 
Top