Fine, that's a criticism of concrete things that he's done. I've got no problem with that and actually agree that they count against him. It's a bit different from slagging him off for receiving an award - which was not after all his own decision - for being good at his job and achieving some things that I'd have thought any reasonably progressive person would regard favourably.With the legal stuff my main issues are him deciding that nobody be prosecuted for the deaths of Charles de Menezes and initially Ian Tomlinson.
Oh well done, very perceptive of you.I think both Tea and John are being sarcastic.
Fine, that's a criticism of concrete things that he's done. I've got no problem with that and actually agree that they count against him. It's a bit different from slagging him off for receiving an award - which was not after all his own decision - for being good at his job and achieving some things that I'd have thought any reasonably progressive person would regard favourably.
I guess symbolic things like this matter more to some people than to others. It doesn't particularly bother me but it may be a decision he ends up regretting if a sufficiently large number of people feel the way you do about it.People turn these things down all the time. He didn’t. He chose a side.
I post this almost entirely to annoy Jon: https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/article/keir-starmer-labour-leader