Your mode of perception on the internet and tv is very analytical. Everything is broadcasted with intent, it's there for a reason, it's there for you to find out what the reason is behind it, to decode it analytically. Your brain goes in sorting mode, what's important for me, what pertains, categorizing these immobilities and fixities. An enternal sequence of innumerable events.
Real life is flowing, free, no fixed points, it's not there for a reason, it's not information that's packaged with specific plans, it's just there in constant flux. You can't analyze you have to intuit it, sense it. It's a difference function of the brain I think.
I also find such distinctions interesting. Online as a sort of metaphysical environment, offline as physical. To be sure, the correlation isn't so clean, but there generally seems to be one.
Another correlation to online/offline is, perhaps similar to your points, a difference in signal-to-noise? Like you say: everything is broadcast with intent. Surely, there still remains the possibility for signal error (grand or petty), but seeing as the metaphysical space is entirely sculpted by human will, might there still be a significantly higher signal/noise ratio? Sort of like a distillation of intelligence's world-forming/world-reforming abilities.
"Natural" environment -> rural environment -> urban environment -> online environment -> ?
Can this kind of development be figured as a vector? If so, where does it lead us beyond here?
What precisely does this vector measure? (vector here understood to be... directional and quantitative? Aiming in a certain direction with a certain magnitude?)
As we progress down this line, our communicative abilities become... purer? Does that mean more homogenous? More immediate? Less drowned out by environmental signal-effecting factors, by noise?
Perhaps in an absolute sense, there is less and less noise from the outside. But in a relative sense, our signal remains dampened by noise that is attributable to our own confusion, attributable to our own non-deliberate/unintentional signals? A sort of noise that is effectual before the message is even sent?
So, to an extent, the signal/noise ratio remains mediocre, but is becoming increasingly... immanent? Immanent noise?
That is: the factors that prevent my expressions from more purely reflecting my intentions - these factors are less and less environmental, and more and more internal. Similar to how doubt can destabilize your confidence, how doubt can sever
your idea of what you are trying to say from
your idea of what you are saying. As environmental noise is filtered out, noise-by-way-of-doubt is given room to blossom? Is this afforded by the ever-increasing opportunity we have to refine our messages before we send them?