version

Well-known member
The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction's being sold as a mass market paperback on Amazon.

😂
 

version

Well-known member
Just rereading this piece on WWI,
Can we still find people able to tell a proper story? How are the words of the dying passed on from generation to generation like an ancestral ring? Who, today, has a helpful proverb ready to hand? Who attempts to deal with the young by evoking past experience?

No, this much is clear: experience’s stock has fallen and did so for a generation that underwent, from 1914 to 1918, one of the most horrific experiences in world history. Perhaps this is not as surprising as it seems. Was the observation not made at the time that people returned mute from the battlefield? They did not come back richer in experiences they could impart, but poorer. What flowed into the flood of books about the war that appeared ten years later was anything but experience, which streams from lips to ears. No, this was not surprising at all.

For experiences have never been refuted more thoroughly than strategic ones were by trench warfare, economic ones by inflation, physical ones by hunger, ethical ones by the ruling powers. A generation that had gone to school in horse-drawn streetcars found itself under the open sky in a landscape in which only the clouds were unchanged and where, in the midst of it all, in a force field crossed by devastating currents and explosions, stood the tiny, fragile human body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

sus

Moderator
he has a good book about his childhood though, Berlin Childhood 1904

but his ideas are insane!!! he's a maniac!!
 

sus

Moderator
He's totally wrong about strategic experiences though.

Trench warfare was developed during the (American) Civil War specifically in response to the failures of Napoleonic theory to accommodate modern rifled bores. It was specifically the repeated experience of theory's failure that led to new theory. Trench warfare is a testimony to the power of experience, not the opposite as Bejamin (as I read him?) claims.
 

sus

Moderator
I think his mechanical reproduction stuff is good, but his "Task of the Translator" is one of the strangest experiences I've had reading theory. He just doesn't understand language at all, I think, and it shows. Some of the "aesthetic autonomy" concepts are on display in the very first paragraph:

1597518033657.png

Puh-lease.
 

version

Well-known member
I'd actually considered making a thread on WWI in general. It seemed (relatively) neglected in comparison to WWII, at least in the public consciousness and pop culture, then we got Battlefield 1, that Peter Jackson film and Sam Mendes' 1917 in quick succession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus

linebaugh

Well-known member
You hear alot of our present mirroring the times before WW1. Definitely feels its reentering the discourse
 

sus

Moderator
I'd actually considered making a thread on WWI in general. It seemed (relatively) neglected in comparison to WWII, at least in the public consciousness and pop culture, then we got Battlefield 1, that Peter Jackson film and Sam Mendes' 1917 in quick succession.

+1 on this, I've always meant to read Guyotat
 

sus

Moderator
Also, I'm always hype to tell people about FL Allen's Only Yesterday, a history of the roarin' 20s written in 1930
 
Top