The Weight of Digital Realism

version

Well-known member
pre digital films look weirdly low resolution to me. it used to be digital would make me feel weird now its the other way round my eye has adapted. i rewatched keliors London and couldnt beleive how low resolution it is.

Is there not a remaster? A decent Blu-ray of something shot on film can look gorgeous, see: any of the boutique Blu-ray companies, e.g. Criterion.
 

version

Well-known member
It's a quirk of technology that the latest can highlight things you weren't aware of in the previous, like HD making the wires visible during stunts and enhancing the film grain. There's stuff I've seen where it feels like you can see every speck of dirt on the lens.
 

version

Well-known member
A working digital colorist or cinematographer in 2024 is likely all too familiar with one particular question: “Can we get the ‘film look’?” A decade into the age of digital sensors as the increasingly dominant and default shooting format, filmmakers at all budget levels are increasingly looking back at celluloid for inspiration. Phenomena once seen as drawbacks to be minimized—grain, chromatic aberration, anamorphic distortion, lens flares, halation—have not only become desired, but, if hordes of YouTube camera gurus are to be believed, “cinematic.” That is, these elements associated with this particular image formation workflow are essential to what constitutes “cinema,” a form that within this logic reached its textural apex in Hollywood at some point in the 1970s. A sort of textural neoclassicism has taken hold.

 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
A working digital colorist or cinematographer in 2024 is likely all too familiar with one particular question: “Can we get the ‘film look’?” A decade into the age of digital sensors as the increasingly dominant and default shooting format, filmmakers at all budget levels are increasingly looking back at celluloid for inspiration. Phenomena once seen as drawbacks to be minimized—grain, chromatic aberration, anamorphic distortion, lens flares, halation—have not only become desired, but, if hordes of YouTube camera gurus are to be believed, “cinematic.” That is, these elements associated with this particular image formation workflow are essential to what constitutes “cinema,” a form that within this logic reached its textural apex in Hollywood at some point in the 1970s. A sort of textural neoclassicism has taken hold.

A problem is that even if the filming media are thereby optimised, our displays are not necessarily best and they are certainly different to what we had in the 80s. A celluloid projector now may be the same as one back then but LCD screens do not produce images and moving images in the same way that CRTs do.

I think a good rule of thumb is that the degree to which a creative medium enables intuitive subconscious artistic decision-making should be maximised. CGI, for instance, involves far too deliberate a creative process.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Film-makers should also not restrict their use of celluloid to period pieces...it's like only releasing 70s music on vinyl.
 
Top