linebaugh

Well-known member
My friend was at a job fair and he showed up grabbed the mic and started screaming at every body. no cameras, wasn't a particularly big event he was just following his heart in the moment.
 

woops

is not like other people
Trump tells court lies, fraud, spreading hatred were "performance art", cites bizarre make up as evidence
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Leo

version

Well-known member
That Twitter thread on Biden's speech Shiels linked to in the Adam Curtis thread's worth a read,
Adam Curtis once leaned heavily on the book 'Everything was forever, until it was no more' by Alexei Yurchak - a slightly odd book about the way that language in the Soviet Union slowly degraded. Instead of confronting reality, the job of propagandists, indeed of all official discourse, was to stitch together a series of recognisable banalities. Ideas that once were essential parts of the concrete social project of the Soviet Union - building a worker's state - were now invoked in whatever context needed. Thus, you could praise the 'trenchant labour of the workers' when discussing the publication of a new edition of technical guidelines for building tractors. The incredible brittleness of this cut-and-paste discourse meant that no-one in the Soviet Union was able to process, let alone alter, the decay of the Union and its increasingly unstable economic system. So when the end came, it came as if in a dream. It suddenly made just as much sense for the Soviet Union not to exist as it made for it to have existed for decades.

Today, Joe Biden - who has not without justice been compared to Brezhnev - stands reading a speech that is in essence the same as those made by Soviet functionaries. No sentence bears any resemblance to the previous one, as it does in an argument, but only makes sense as a series of moderately recognisable cliches. The point of the speech is not to refer to the world, but to refer to the system of symbols that historically legitimated the American political order. These symbols - the american dream, opportunity, prosperity, liberty, justice, community, unity, hope - have little reality today. But that doesn't matter. They are mere symbols, signifiers without signified. They refer to nothing but themselves. This is discourse as a hall of mirrors. Likewise, Joe Biden is not a politician, he is a mirror: a mirror which reflects the platitudes America tells itself in order to sleep at night.

But, as Jean Beaudrillard warned us, in order to see what we want to see in the mirror, we have to hide our second-self behind it. To see 'unity' we have to hide division. To see 'prosperity' we have to hide poverty. Hiding these things is not just a function of Joe Biden's rhetoric, but of the social project which he does reflect: the overwhelming need to put the populist project - which however imperfectly does reflect real division and poverty - in its box.

How long, we should ask, can America hide what it needs to hide in order to see unity? How long until those second souls, currently trapped behind the mirror, have their revenge?
 
Last edited:

version

Well-known member
tumblr_o6p9bfcDlv1rrecxqo3_500.gif
 

Leo

Well-known member
That Twitter thread on Biden's speech Shiels linked to in the Adam Curtis thread's worth a read,

not really, though. for example.

The point of the speech is not to refer to the world, but to refer to the system of symbols that historically legitimated the American political order. These symbols - the american dream, opportunity, prosperity, liberty, justice, community, unity, hope - have little reality today.

Really? Says who? It's a deeply cynical and potentially untrue reading because those symbols certainly mean a lot to many people. Maybe not me and you, but we're not the masses. I know plenty of people who hold those symbols dear, they're just not on Twitter (or dissensus).

To see 'unity' we have to hide division. To see 'prosperity' we have to hide poverty. Hiding these things is not just a function of Joe Biden's rhetoric, but of the social project which he does reflect: the overwhelming need to put the populist project - which however imperfectly does reflect real division and poverty - in its box.

also off base, because biden expounded at length on the divisions the country faces. he wasn't hiding them.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Sure... they don't want it too close to them but it's good to know it's out there. Also functions as a cautionary tale.
 

version

Well-known member
I'm not convinced. My impression's they don't even want to acknowledge it's possible. Out of sight, out of mind.
 
Top