Why does the left hate crypto so much?

sus

sus

Moderator
Clinamenic said:
It seems like third rarely proceeds in bad faith.
Click to expand...
Third proceeds in nothing but bad faith. I've yet to see one instance of him actually making an effort—as evidenced by even approximate interpretive accuracy—to understand any one of the messages he's attacked.
 
C

catalog

Well-known member
and to his and spens credit, hes not dropped any turkish youtubes yet. i thikn the credit is all spens really on that front.
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
suspended said:
What are you talking about? When have I ever discussed a political figure on this board?

And I'm literally laughing my ass off at the idea that you—or anyone—can look at things "objectively"

The whole point of experimentation and science broadly is to get past subjective hunches and see what actually works, which is about as close as we get to objectivity—but we'll never see anything objectively, we'll only have theories with predictive power.
Click to expand...

Yes, thank you for recapitulating the Kantian problematic.

Unfortunately you are wrong on two counts. 1) we are not dealing with the philosophy of science but politics and 2) pursuant to that we are dealing with the political subject, not the cognitive subject.
 
C

catalog

Well-known member
i was a bit upset about boxedjoy's treatment, i'll admit that. cos boxedjoy dropped some good tunes and liked his food as well.
 
sus

sus

Moderator
Proceeding in good faith means actively caring what the other person is saying, what they mean, actively steelmanning their position, and then pointing out problems.

Jumping in with bizarre insults and condescensions that completely miss the point of the post they respond to is not what it means to operate in good faith.
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
thirds intellectual background is marxism which claims to be an objective science which is why it's impossible to have a conversation with him about politics becasue marxism is a dogma and its adherents have to learn the dogma and regurgitate it there's no room for doubt or discussion. every marxist is like this its not peculiar to third. its the nature of marxism.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sus
sus

sus

Moderator
thirdform said:
Yes, thank you for recapitulating the Kantian problematic.

Unfortunately you are wrong on two counts. 1) we are not dealing with the philosophy of science but politics and 2) pursuant to that we are dealing with the political subject, not the cognitive subject.
Click to expand...
Loling that you think philosophy of science is about "a discipline called science" and not the larger problems of "how do we know things"
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
thats why you should never get into an argument with a marxist you should just ok cool bro and walk away
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
that doesnt mean that marxism is wrong or anything just that you should on no account ever try and discuss things with them cos they will just insult you and shout at you. all of them are like this
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
just say philosophy is too hard, i dont understand it. thats totally fine. its too hard for us too.
 
C

catalog

Well-known member
you should all read a short essay by heidegger called "the question concerning technology" it's very good. it's better than benjamin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top