IdleRich

IdleRich
I don't think it's as clear cut as that. There was a bit in one of the articles @wild greens posted about a footballer who was pressured into having injections and whatnot by the medical staff and management at their club and how it wasn't presented as cheating, just what's done. The author even went as far as to say it isn't possible to compete at the highest level without doping.

The other thing with this stuff is that if everyone's doing it then you have to weigh up whether it's worth potentially tanking the entire sport to deal with it. That doctor who was involved in the cycling said if they properly investigated and were serious then they'd have to take the World Cup off the Spanish football team.
Yes, I'm not making any kind of moral judgment here or saying that I would somehow rise above it. I was really just thinking out loud about how those long-after-the-event tests can potentially create a whole new kind of psychological horror.
Suppose that I was given this special new drug which allowed me to run the 100m in 8,7 seconds and thus guaranteed me the gold. Sure, eyebrows would be raised as a 43 year old man who had previously shown little in the way of interest in or aptitude for sprint racing took almost a second off the world record, but, as the drug was invented last week by my trainer and is completely undetetectable it's all cool.... except someone of my temperament (which is not a rare one in this respect I would have thought) would never really be able to truly celebrate the win; instantly reduced to a bag of nerves, waiting every day for the fall of the Sword of Damocles manifest as news that they can now detect this drug and that my "achievement" - the one that justifies my entire life - is about to be yanked away.
For a lot of people, the idea that every day that dawned might be the one in which I went from "miraculous sprinter who gave hope and encouragement to older competitors all round the world" to "evil drug cheat whose betrayal was the cruellest of all" would be something that can't just be shrugged off. My life would become that of the guy in The Telltale Heart except instead of instead of giving me away from under the floorboards it would be beating guiltily in my own chest! Each pulse a further turn of the screw taking me closer to insanity.
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
Why don't they let athletes juice? Is it cos it's dangerous or something? Or "unnatural"?
level playing field, in the sense of only what you're born with

which is sticky bc, as noted, genetic differences will always exist, tho sports are obviously more than just a best genes contest (albeit for almost anything at a high level one needs to clear an absurdly high floor of genetic talent to even seriously compete). and there's no single line where a particular supplement or whatever is going to be performance-enhancing in an "unfair" or "unnatural" way.

the "dangerous" argument is usually extended to kids (or minors, anyway) - if kids see role model adults do it they'll do it - because all things being equal, why shouldn't adults who are aware of the risks be able to take whatever substances they want? many sports are inherently dangerous, and so are plenty of activities and substances adults partake of legally.

personally I would never take anything stupid - just whey protein + creatine (incidentally, the only useful supplements - the (legal) supplement industy is a vast ocean of snake oil) because the risk or cost isn't remotely worth the reward, but if it was potentially the difference between a gold metal and 6th place, or landing/not landing millions in endorsements, or whatever, who knows? thankfully I don't have to make that kind of choice
 

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
I assume as a general rule that everyone in high-level sport is on whatever they can get away with (this is what comes of being a fan of both cycling + weightlifting), especially in anything strength or endurance-related

certainly people dope all the time in regular amateur (i.e. not the Olympics, just people not good enough to be pros) competition all the time, which is incredibly stupid and not worth it, so when there's actually enormous rewards on the line why would it be different
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
South African greetings from Oz to Oz


Zj-DZ802J2BfTknvZJnw_tb_7htgc6HFkrKkee1XQkgvPr7EenlkjBGjo9-kEGnBBYCbQPEN7UVWs-Fo0tLGyLbIm3y5gjXwEcJn0P0


"yes Bakkies, whatever you say Bakkies"

maxresdefault.jpg

WhatsApp_Image_2018-09-03_at_13.51.02.width-800.jpg


Justice as smash

john-smit-wearing-a-justice-for-bakkies-armband-pic-getty-107700983.jpg


Add the elevation, yetis
 

jenks

thread death
I don't know why, but I'm not into the athletics at all right now. Literally couldn't care less.
The British T&F team really not covering themselves in glory; stories of spikes setting v ridiculous records; distinct lack of personalities- all reasons I’ve been less invested. Plus other sports seem more exciting - the Italians beating nailed on favs Denmark in the 4 man pursuit; speed climbing; the kiwi rower and of course, the BMX.
 

luka

Well-known member
what it would feel like to be a grown woman who has dedicated her whole life to skating then
you get beaten by a 12 year old at the Olympics.
 

version

Well-known member
what it would feel like to be a grown woman who has dedicated her whole life to skating then
you get beaten by a 12 year old at the Olympics.
A 12 year old was the first person to land a 1080 on a skateboard and another 12 year old recently landed one in competition in front of Tony Hawk.


 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
That is mental.

Is it right for me to think that a child, being smaller, has a slightly bigger window of time in which to rotate their body/board? Or would that be mitigated by them not being able to jump as high as an adult?
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
Interesting phenomenon that I'm particularly familiar with in skateboarding of people being able to do things once thought impossible because they've grown up seeing someone do it before them.
 
Top