post pictures your computer has generated ( algorithmic art )

WashYourHands

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
So, you rinse the initial free quota getting to a point where you think your prompts tally, only to find a ltd post splurge option begging you to buy more

Gotta love dopamine
 
sufi

sufi

lala
william_kent said:
another thing I learnt from that article is that people are actually charging $1.99 to create a prompt for those too lazy to come up with their own

I have seen discussion elsewhere that in the future "prompt engineer" could become a viable profession, which must really piss off those guys who can actually build bridges and shit - it was bad enough when computer programmers started referring to themselves as "software engineers", but now the artistic types are in on the act...
Click to expand...
Similar skill to creating effective searches on Google/ddg,
maybe AI whisperer is becoming a thing to be
 
mixed_biscuits

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
1660559991559.png
Jesse Lingard as a lollipop lady, helping children across a busy road; photorealistic oil painting

Can I have my credit back, DALL-E?
 
WashYourHands

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
One more European Cup/CL win and we‘re tied. How embarrassing would that be for Utd?

Every cunt takes sponsorship at some level but some more than others. Forest never had a buy out that left them nursing 50million in debt interest payments every month. Oh no, I may have stumbled into one of your The Jews/Glazers conspiracy spiral
 
droid

droid

Well-known member
With the SD model now being shared openly, we're probably mere weeks away from private text to image child porn servers.
 
droid

droid

Well-known member
Not to mention that any private version will probably include init images. So paedophiles will be be able to generate extremely realistic imagery featuring themselves and the child of their choosing. They deliberately left init out of the public version of SD because the mods are already swamped with porn.
 
william_kent

william_kent

Well-known member
The multi-millionaire funder of stability.ai seems to recognise that there is the potential for harm... quote from this article

Of course, with open access and the ability to run the model on a widely available GPU, the opportunity for abuse increases dramatically.

“A percentage of people are simply unpleasant and weird, but that’s humanity,” Mostaque said. “Indeed, it is our belief this technology will be prevalent, and the paternalistic and somewhat condescending attitude of many AI aficionados is misguided in not trusting society.”

Mostaque stresses, however, that free availability allows the community to develop countermeasures.

“We are taking significant safety measures including formulating cutting-edge tools to help mitigate potential harms across release and our own services. With hundreds of thousands developing on this model, we are confident the net benefit will be immensely positive and as billions use this tech harms will be negated.”
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top