woops
is not like other people
I knew it! Tea is an agent
Henri Bergson
- Thread starter DLaurent
- Start date
"Notably, the left side of his face became frozen and also never aged. At the same time, the right side of his face ages normally."
I have a suspicion time is not in any way like a frikkin rugby ball!
Says “
CERN Opened the Door: What Came Through?
A blog about esoteric symbolism in pop culture and the media.secretsun.blogspot.com
This of course, is Fake-Spiritualized”
- so where did ‘tear a hole in the fabric of spacetime come from’ ? and why is quantum physics represented in pop or consciousness culture as the other side of the mirror whereas in reality it’s just talking about electron behavior and characteristics which are ‘here’ this side of the mirror just as much as anything else?
But why is the behavior of electrons considered non mechanistic?
don’t understand…?
i mean that a lot of things in life are a transformational process going on. like you get your soup, put it in the pan, turn the cooker on and it heats up.
there's the moment of transformation, when you see the bubbles, and it's becoming the other thing, the thing that was the first thing, but is now going to be hot.
we as mere humans with our limited consciousness cannot see that whole thing as one thing, we have to split it up. we can't see that the soup is always hot, always cold.
even, now, in the way i've put it, i sound like an idiot, new age or something, and that's the other problem, language cannot articulate it either.
Look no I don’t mean it that way. Here is a quote I just read that correlates (because this brave new world thing has stamped and embedded itself upon our post war minds and I think it’s false), from a film theory essay- “Jacques Aumont provides a vivid analysis of the divergent relationship which cinema has with modernity in comparison to the other arts: It’s clear, modernity is not a matter of art or art history, it is a matter of historical conscience and a system- intellectual, moral and, ultimately, ontological - for relating to the world. The modern person starts from defiance towards the world, our world … Strange modernity, which wants to encounter its era, but where it is closest to that which is unchanging: the notion of being-in-the-world, Geworfenheit, the inherent ambiguity of reality… Modern cinema leaves the world to manage on its own in order for it to have meaning.”
Anyhow I am also bad at science and clearly also writing!
No, this is awesome, thanks… so it’s basically delineated by transformation that is clearly discernible to humans (whereas actually there is changing all the time maybe maybe not), based right ‘here’
(Well since I was at one time inappropriately accosted by a sadhu I don’t think much of their profession)- it’s both isn’t it