Mr. Tea

Shub-Niggurath, Please
You would be a good peer-reviewer, heading off any academic progress at the pass because each time the paper says something new 😂
I'm perfectly happy to accept new ideas if there's good evidence for them. It's just that my standard for evidence is a bit higher than unreferenced Substack posts by generic grifting right-wing contrarians.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
I'm dipping into all this nonsense for the first time in ages cos it seems clear that reading this thread regularly is literally damaging people's brains. But surely you can sThis is a normie line: most people don't do X which means X is wrong

He didn't say that at all, he said that feminists don't often make the argument that "Because most people aborted may be female we should ban abortion" - the inference to be drawn was clearly something along the lines of "Feminists don't say this, so feminists don't think this" or, in short, this is not a feminist argument. No comment is made as to rightness or wrongness, however it does seem like a relatively good way of rejecting your sneaky attempt to claim that you're making a feminist argument for abortion. Which you're not.

Anyway, I am exiting the brain-damage thread and, any attempt to draw me into it, from anyone at all, will be met with a robust and appropriate refusal along the lines of "Fuck off Biscuits you cunt" or if, was someone else, say @WashYourHands I might say something such as, I dunno "Oh, go fuck yourself Biscuits you dumb twat" or whatever.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
I'm dipping into all this nonsense for the first time in ages cos it seems clear that reading this thread regularly is literally damaging people's brains. But surely you can sThis is a normie line: most people don't do X which means X is wrong

He didn't say that at all, he said that feminists don't often make the argument that "Because most people aborted may be female we should ban abortion" - the inference to be drawn was clearly something along the lines of "Feminists don't say this, so feminists don't think this" or, in short, this is not a feminist argument. No comment is made as to rightness or wrongness, however it does seem like a relatively good way of rejecting your sneaky attempt to claim that you're making a feminist argument for abortion. Which you're not.

Anyway, I am exiting the brain-damage thread and, any attempt to draw me into it, from anyone at all, will be met with a robust and appropriate refusal along the lines of "Fuck off Biscuits you cunt" or if, was someone else, say @WashYourHands I might say something such as, I dunno "Oh, go fuck yourself Biscuits you dumb twat" or whatever.
I didn't say I was making a feminist argument for abortion.
 

Leo

Well-known member
there couldn't possibly be any other reason for case numbers going up, there's air-tight scientific proof that people get sick as a direct result of getting vaxxed, right?

since few people actually get boosters, isn't most of the general population who get sick in these waves actually people who aren't boosted?
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
there couldn't possibly be any other reason for case numbers going up, there's air-tight scientific proof that people get sick as a direct result of getting vaxxed, right?

Absolutely, you know the famous saying "Correlation totally proves causation beyond any possible doubt" right?
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
there couldn't possibly be any other reason for case numbers going up, there's air-tight scientific proof that people get sick as a direct result of getting vaxxed, right?

since few people actually get boosters, isn't most of the general population who get sick in these waves actually people who aren't boosted?
It's accepted that you're at increased risk of becoming infected for a short time after the jab (during which the authorities don't deem it necessary to call you vaccinated lol)
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Weirdly the DJ after me played that song on Saturday night. I think I was the only one there old enough to remember it.
 
Top