music writing that feels like a relic from the past: a repository

shakahislop

Well-known member
This article feels like a different world now

yeah right. that oasis gig as well actually. hard to separate out the personal aging effect from reality obviously. but it is a pretty fascinating thing to me. that over a comparatively short time it feels like a different world. i don't think that's necessarily just a normal thing that human beings experience; i do think it says something about the times themselves.
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
for one thing in that oasis video - and you're going to have to take it as read that i'm not a racist or a xenophobe - it is striking how comprehensively white that crowd is. unbroken pale hues, like the 19th century
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
i'm not saying that it's particularly good music writing. but there is definitely something in the idea that something that was possible for a long time, and which generated many dreams, was that you could write about music and musical events in a way that made them seem like a kind of fantasy parallel universe. and that i think would be more or less impossible now, mostly i think because you would also have a load of photos and videos from the event, which would bring it all down to earth

 

forclosure

Well-known member
i also think of Robert Christagau suggesting that since Wendy O Williams from the Plasmatics couldn't sing that she should try singing with her pussy lips

and then there's his review of M.O.P.'s Warriorz :
"Warriorz [Loud, 2000]
Ooh, Eminem, scary. You want a rap record to terrify your ass, how about one with a street anthem about robbing niggaz? Socially redeeming characteristic: will discourage young African American men from wearing jewelry. Billy Danze is the coarse-grained DMX bellower with the crazy laugh, Lil' Fame his rugged sidekick. Wielding brazen, unrelenting samples, they attack like a firing squad on a spree, with a fierce joy Guns N' Roses would abjure hard drugs for. As is no secret, I hate gangsta rap-hate its smugness, its brutality, its cool, its lies, its contempt for the ordinary, its failure to provide role models for young African American men. But this specimen convinces me that, sometimes, thugs have more fun-get large in the ways that matter by shitting on anybody they fucking feel like. I scoff at "guilty pleasures," too. Pleasure is nothing to feel guilty about. This may be. A-"
 

luka

Well-known member
99% of the music press stuff reads so badly, but it always did. Taylor Parkes, Neal Kulkarni, all that personality driven writing is really bad, much worse than the also very bad music they're slating.
 

craner

Beast of Burden
99% of the music press stuff reads so badly, but it always did. Taylor Parkes, Neal Kulkarni, all that personality driven writing is really bad, much worse than the also very bad music they're slating.

I knew you’d enjoy that, I dug it out especially for you.
 

luka

Well-known member
does your moisturiser sting your eyes when you put it on? my sister got me one for christmas, Kiehl's facial fuel and it really burns. obviously i dont put it in my eyes, its the vapours or something.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sus

version

Well-known member
One of the primary differences these days seems to be the distance between the reviewer and the material. They don't necessarily discuss whether they like it or how it sounds, but they do discuss the cultural influence and positioning of it, what it represents, how other people have or will respond to it.

We did the same thing with Joker on here. Some of us didn't even watch the film, but we ended up with a big thread on the cultural implications of it.
 

version

Well-known member
The ephemeral nature of the web's obviously a major factor. You might want to write a serious review of something, but does it feel worth putting in the work for an article that will disappear within days, if not hours, or a Letterboxd review or YouTube comment that will get buried? That or it gets picked up on for the wrong reasons and you get roasted by a bunch of people on Twitter.

The tech caters to firing out impulsive fragments and checking your impulses for fear of censure. That, combined with the ideological framework for assessing everything, is pretty limiting.
 

craner

Beast of Burden
does your moisturiser sting your eyes when you put it on? my sister got me one for christmas, Kiehl's facial fuel and it really burns. obviously i dont put it in my eyes, its the vapours or something.

I like Kiehl’s liquid body cleanser for morning ablutions, but I use an organic moisturiser which doesn’t sting my eyes.
 

forclosure

Well-known member
The ephemeral nature of the web's obviously a major factor. You might want to write a serious review of something, but does it feel worth putting in the work for an article that will disappear within days, if not hours, or a Letterboxd review or YouTube comment that will get buried? That or it gets picked up on for the wrong reasons and you get roasted by a bunch of people on Twitter.

The tech caters to firing out impulsive fragments and checking your impulses for fear of censure. That, combined with the ideological framework for assessing everything, is pretty limiting.
i mean this is what twitter tried to do with having a bigger character length and allowing people to make threads, it makes things slightly easier and of better use for people who want to do that sort of long form thing but even then the very manner in which its structured just doesn't help in the long run
 
Top