Clinamenic
Binary & Tweed
But I do still agree: that math renders intelligible a great portion of the phenomena enabling our consciousness and other cognitive functions.
Yes, I am relatively uninformed about this stuff but agree with you. Math is just a more precise way of talking about stuffUltimately I with you here, but I would still assert that math like all other conceptual frameworks are part of the map and not the territory. I think even percepts like visual input are still more map than territory.
Do your homework Leo. Did you read any of the linked chapter? The whole thrust is he's trying to defend art as an alternative to the scientific and manifest images of the world, i.e. defend it as a layer at which we can speak "romantically" or "passionately" and still "truthfully."A dry, unromantic perspective on life.
Perhaps that’s been your impression of science, but science for me has been an ineffably wonderful chain of revelations.A dry, unromantic perspective on life.
Just yesterday I watched a general audience seminar on general relativity and the theory around black holes, and the presenter gave such an intuitive explanation of things that I experienced yet another moment of grokking something I had for a while struggled to understand.Perhaps that’s been your impression of science, but science for me has been an ineffably wonderful chain of revelations.
can you give me a link to that mate?Just yesterday I watched a general audience seminar on general relativity and the theory around black holes, and the presenter gave such an intuitive explanation of things that I experienced yet another moment of grokking something I had for a while struggled to understand.
He used the concept of escape velocity to illustrate how/why black holes look the way they do, that as a massive body gets denser the escape velocity eventually exceeds the speed of light. Still a bunch of stuff I don’t grok yet, but moments like that are magical for me.
Sure, here it is. The first half is the lecture, and then a couple other graduate panelists come on for Q&A.can you give me a link to that mate?
I have a thought you might think is interesting that we could work at. Will see if I can put it into words soon. It might spell the rise of a new dissensus golden age.Very disappointed in Dissensus this morning
The first pages especially are clunky. Once you get past page 2/3, things get much smoother I think. He's just trying to force too much into one placeit's pretty interesting but I do think there's an annoying idiom of elegance in the way he writes