Search results

your hypothesis is a weak as your beats buddy.. go home.

:mad: you are impossible! when did you fuck last time?!

why this????????whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

im quite the pussy. you are absolutely right here. unless the nazis come to my village, right?

david graeber: "Still, everywhere one finds the same core (anarchist) principles: decentralization, voluntary association, mutual aid, the network model, and above all, the rejection of any idea that the end justifies the means, let alone that the business of a revolutionary is to seize state...

can we claim that anarchists are responsible for the 'anarchist streak' in badious ontology? i would say yes.. i welcome that.. what my problem with the anarchists is their 'regulative Idea' (to use your logic against you), means = the ends (how absolute is that?).. this leaves us with very...

oops. sorry vim.. that nihilism was aimed at you.. not communism. edit: im gonna be gone for a while.. thanks everyone. lost a good amount of sleep, but it felt good.. even if some of yall want me to return to the ustase! that one didnt feel good.

Rampant nihilism. im not sure its that simple vim..

i cant accept this.. i cant accept that an ontology of 'we', in practice, is inherently bound to fail.. communism is simply the signifier for this 'we'. this is essentially badious point, if we abandon the 'we' then we are abandoning any notion of collective action. lets let everyone worry about...

whats stop and go? im scared to google it. edit: happy may day

i think this is fair. i would say, basically, that communism insists 'we'. i am for this.

i was 'drinking the piss' as well

concerning the "pure ideal" (in his own words): “‘The communist hypothesis remains the good one, I do not see any other. If we have to abandon this hypothesis, then it is no longer worth doing anything at all in the field of collective action. Without the horizon of communism, without this...

nice.

wait, so you still dont believe im croatian?

croatia.. paradise! fuck! why didnt i think of that sooner..

fuck did everyone else go?

but this doesnt work!!! why would i go back to the Ustase?! youre so confused, jesus.. the Ustase were Croatian fascists that killed Serbian people.. Im half-serbian, half-croatian.. they didnt care if you were 2 percent serbian.. im as good as dead to them.. and to you as well, clearly..

i mean, this is the most basic question!!! how do we achieve peace? by saying it? youre entering what you claim to be 'transcendental'.. if peace is your "Real" then accept it, and figure out how to make that Real real. i support this!

i would rather be physically harmed than live in that awfully awfully nihilistic and cynical head of yours any day..