Search results

  1. T

    Since it's been a while since we had an Israel/Palestine thread...

    you have to remember that biscuits has unparalleled psychokenetic powers. It would be prudent to note, however, that he has only been able to manifest his self-enslavement to a cuckold dilemma where the cuckolder is always right.
  2. T

    How full of rage are you?

    I hate drug culture for this reason. I keep telling @luka to get so high on acid he transforms into a teetotal zealot. but he never truly breaks through. come on, mr. erasmus davis, do 27 tabs at once.
  3. T

    Choon of the Day, redux

    let me be very clear I am against alcoholism, but ultimately for Tolstoylian reasons. it is a pathological inability to order all the minute aspects of ones socially conscious existence in a systematic way. @shiels for instance is a medievalist catholic at heart, otherwise he'd knock booze and...
  4. T

    Choon of the Day, redux

    Also @luka @luka @luka
  5. T

    Choon of the Day, redux

    look my jewish friend said I have created an intellectual justification for transracialism after I said I'm not against whitegirl muslim converts so long as they don't become religious but asian. So only stripping naked at freshers night after at least 50 double rums consumed. I mean, the wwelsh...
  6. T

    How full of rage are you?

    Hard and soft determinism are just philosophical sophisms. They should be rejected along with the pseudo problem of free will vs determinism. But I'll continue to use it to irritate both you and her (sorry his) majesty's government constantly banging on about OBE's. why not take a lecture with a...
  7. T

    How full of rage are you?

    as for the straight forwardly materialist shape of things, you aren't arguing about the human will, you are arguing for its freedom. freedom can only be negative. So what is it free from? If you argued that humans are able to act in determined constraints, a will which is determined to greater...
  8. T

    How full of rage are you?

    no, you're backtracking. you haven't explained how these facts contradict my argument. because they would require you to deny physical determination. Also if you're not trying to persuade me, then why on earth do you want to be persuaded by my argument? this is the cuckold dilemma again isn't...
  9. T

    Choon of the Day, redux

  10. T

    Choon of the Day, redux

    Dilbert you must think like a renaissance black man. no frenchies.
  11. T

    1994 was 30 years ago

    the mad ragga john remix has a gangster bebopism though. it's in that lineage of 11.55 (gangsta remix) but even more tense and nervous. In polemics democracy carries no weight for us, the massive agreeing or disagreeing is irrelevant!
  12. T

    How full of rage are you?

    But you're evading the point. you deny the existence of the physical world? things can be retroactively caused, or have multiple causes, whilst still being physically determined. In some senses it is true that causation is a manner in which we order things in of themselves for things-for-us. In...
  13. T

    How full of rage are you?

    and yet you are terminally unable to explain the books you cite in a convincing manner.
  14. T

    How full of rage are you?

    But don't you see? I can trap you in a cuckolded dilemma here. Various events in the material world may determine that shagging and marrying your wife is a possibility, in which case I'm right, or various other events may determine me to want to marry my cousin, in which case, I'm also right!
  15. T

    How full of rage are you?

    neither does determinism exclude choice, it just means that all choices are in the final instance determined by the material world, and hence it becomes a case of choosing between determinations. Like I said, a pseudo-problem for new age malcontents. the problem only makes some sense if a soul...
  16. T

    How full of rage are you?

    there's nothing to believe in or not to believe in. physical determinations are objective fact.
  17. T

    1994 was 30 years ago

    one of those records which was criminally underplayed
  18. T

    1994 was 30 years ago

    this from jul '94 has the original at any rate https://www.hardscore.com/?p=5230
  19. T

    1994 was 30 years ago

    mad ragga john remix m8.
  20. T

    1994 was 30 years ago

    yes it is, check discogs. unless the discogs entry is wrong? It's possible. @droid can you enlighten us? and anyway, you weren't listening to any jungle after dec 31st 1994, so the fact you know about it makes it '94 😁
Top