And Justin Murphy is a sort of exemplar in my mind as well. But, buying into the paranoid/neurotic based/cucked matrix, I wonder if
any development toward the based is necessarily absolute. That is, what if you can go undercover into another ideology? I think that might be a hint at some way to disrupt/interrogate/critique norms without becoming something similar to alt-right.
Murphy's interview with Moldbug involved Murphy's genuine liberalism being foregrounded, in a curious way, seeing as it is usually buried underneath a courtship with some kind of dissident-right sensibility. Dissident Right seems to describe Moldbug/Yarvin, who did make explicit efforts in that interview to distance himself from supremacists and "MAGAtards". I'd have to listen to it again to pick up on how Murphy's ideological layering unraveled/revealed itself.
But the layering I think is key. You can preserve a genuinely egalitarian impetus within an ideologically inconsistent framework, a framework that may not appear to be egalitarian. One layer disagreeing with the next layer? One sector disagreeing with the neighboring sector?
I think the task, similar to the point
@catalog made about sexiness, would be to establish some pathway(s) for the left that allow for the expression of heterodox and even nomadic ontologies/behaviors, that allow for a kind of unboundedness that seems to be prohibited by the liberal/neoliberal incipient hegemony - without such pathways yielding to resentment
of anyone, of any side.