Who said it was happening on my behalf? The phallus is a system bigger than individuals. It is the narrative that runs through so much mainstream culture that says everything is about the individual's self love. The majority of society assumes the male perspective. They don't do that on my behalf.
Once again, is the phallus "male"? The semantics here are tiresome.
But again—they engage of their own free will. There is all the material in the world online, and people get to understand how they constitute their own sense of meaning.
It's not a skill issue, it's an issue of representation. We all have access to phallic representations. But since the phallus blocks out non-phallic representations, feminine cultural representations are hidden from us. So the matter is assymmetrical. As a matter of empirical fact, too much of our culture ignores feminine experience. To achieve consciousness of the full human experience, we must first awaken the femininity that lies dormant in our society. It's more important to represent non-phallic femininity because feminine culture is underrepresented in our society.
Please, go on pinterest, go on Tumblr. There may not be exact, 1:1 balance, but the idea that culture entirely occludes feminine experience is straight out of the 1950s. It wasn't true in 1968, it's so much less true today, the battle for access to minds is over.
It's clear that access to a narrative that supports an antipathy to our so-called Phallus—ie, having symbolic capital and agency and participating in the construction of society—is available to people if they simply look.
This is the creed of every ideologue—"my ideas are hidden, nobody can access them, this harms society." Have you considered that they're right there on Wikipedia, and people see them, and find them unappealing and unworthy of engagement?
Or, more directly: people like the "Phallus." It gives them meaning. Why fight that?