constant escape

winter withered, warm
Yeah the meta can be viewed as the golden thread here, the spine connecting every physical order of magnitude.

edit: actually, not quite. More like the golden thread that serves as the spine connecting the concrete to the abstract. The base physics to the immaterial spirit.

edit edit: ...think this one was force a bit too much.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
simply saying "complexity" isn't enough to bridge the gap - you don't know why life arose out of non-life and you certainly dont have a mathematical explanation for it sufficient to generate an AI
I'm not saying that I do. I just believe that whatever the thing we have is that looks like free-will arose out of original conditions which intuitively don't seem to make that possible. I don't see why that can't happen again. I don't know how to make it happen again but I think your "It's impossible don't bother trying argument" is fatally flawed.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
Our language of computing is primitive compared to the hypothetical tech required to run the universe - but that doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a lineage to be prognosticated.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
A quote tonight about articulating the now (McC?). Consciousness and qualia. Time as emergent. Trying to understand extinct cultures and their world-views, even though they were all too human. Ok the latter is more of a puzzle-set really around social domains, but go to Callanish and see how your mind tries to grasp it all.
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Yeah I don't disagree with that. I think someone said something a few pages back about how people tend to assume that intelligence will take one form out of the countless ones it could take.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
but there's no reason to presuppose mathematical or even materialist explanations of consciousness
The reason would be to keep going deeper. One could argue that presupposing a foundation just gives you something to bounce off of, which could make scientific pursuits more efficient, provided we remember that the presupposition isn't dogma.
 

vimothy

yurp
The reason would be to keep going deeper. One could argue that presupposing a foundation just gives you something to bounce off of, which could make scientific pursuits more efficient, provided we remember that the presupposition isn't dogma.
the presupposition doesnt matter if it doesnt ever go any where
 

IdleRich

IdleRich
Mathematical modelling has got us quite far with a lot of things but that doesn't mean it will always work. I mean, maybe it's the best tool right now. I don't really know about it. My only point is that the existence of intelligence demonstrates that it was possible for it to magically summoned up somehow from elements that didn't contain it and so there is no reason to suppose that it can't happen again.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
the presupposition doesnt matter if it doesnt ever go any where
But by entertaining the notion that consciousness can have empirical underpinnings, one is motivated to investigate it scientifically. If the notion is never entertained and tossed around, arguably the scientific progress wouldn't be made.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
That is, if all the scientists (or at least all the scientists with the sufficient instruments) firmly believed that consciousness was irreducible to materiality, there would be no movement on that front.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
but there's no reason to presuppose mathematical or even materialist explanations of consciousness

I don't. We're all nuts in certain ways. Have to get past that obstacle first.

The hard question of c will evolve eventually. It's the brain. I am a universe re-presented in consciousness. Can the same thing be re-presented through technology? Again, the more fun problem is human consciousness itself.

This is an ok read. Depends how you take to the author's style, but the chapters themselves provide plenty for your consciousness to ponder and debate

 
Top