suck ur mum luka
clearly talking about mic skills only and what mic skills shud be judged on
now talking about history not just mic skills, changing goalposts is always a sign of a FAILED argument
droid if u can just answer my original post ill let this be
what separates us hip from road rap? technique, subject matter, style, all interchangeable really and truly
the criteria you listed there is pretty subjective, inventiveness? vocal quality?
is it harder to ride a slow reggae beat or a skippy 130 production and sit on it like it is a slow reggae beat?
anyway in terms of flow, rhyme structure, lyrics i dont think it's close, ability wise we're talking about different leagues here unless you wanna say sugarhill gang is the pinnacle of rapping
there's certain things dancehall mcs have over grime mcs/rappers most notably stage presence because they're more performers than spitters, i wouldn't even lump delivery in with stage presence so yeah thats it
not to minimise their contribution to uk music or whatever but in terms of technique that shit is pretty much stone age and you could never convince me otherwise, much less that the best uk mc comes from reggae sorry
/
please try and address everything rather than just focusing on one thing and dismissing the other relevant shit
and before u try strawman my argument into some technique is not the be all and end all def jux bs ill elaborate further
certain things r a given, of course rappers are gonna be on beat (hopefully) and of course they're gonna have lyrics and if they're lucky a nice delivery/"vocal presence"
once u get past these things u're gonna have to break them down further if you really wanna compare them unless you just wanna say boom everythings subjective no debate to be had
so to say that a reggae mc from the eighties who is really and truly only gonna have at best a strong delivery, strong charisma and medium lyrics
is better than an mc from the here and now who is either more well rounded or has the same level of delivery charisma and better lyrics
thats nonsense
further more wtf is ABILITY if not total rap tekkers
/
sneakbo pisses all over chuck d despite chuck having arguably (not imo) better "lyrics" (message)
luka suck ur mum
Best UK MC has to come out of reggae. In fact, Id say the best MC EVER must come from reggae. I dont think any other genre can match it for overall vocal quality, lyrics, inventiveness, flow and ability
only thing that comes close is US hip hop
clearly talking about mic skills only and what mic skills shud be judged on
There's barely a handful of grime MC's that would have made it onto the wings of the stage at a dancehall gig anytime in the 80's or 90's, and as for road rap vs US hip hop? Where is the UK's Rakim, Chuck D, Guru, Busta or Dirty?
lol. Come back to me in 20 years when grime has produced more than a handful of world class MC's.
now talking about history not just mic skills, changing goalposts is always a sign of a FAILED argument
droid if u can just answer my original post ill let this be
what separates us hip from road rap? technique, subject matter, style, all interchangeable really and truly
the criteria you listed there is pretty subjective, inventiveness? vocal quality?
is it harder to ride a slow reggae beat or a skippy 130 production and sit on it like it is a slow reggae beat?
anyway in terms of flow, rhyme structure, lyrics i dont think it's close, ability wise we're talking about different leagues here unless you wanna say sugarhill gang is the pinnacle of rapping
there's certain things dancehall mcs have over grime mcs/rappers most notably stage presence because they're more performers than spitters, i wouldn't even lump delivery in with stage presence so yeah thats it
not to minimise their contribution to uk music or whatever but in terms of technique that shit is pretty much stone age and you could never convince me otherwise, much less that the best uk mc comes from reggae sorry
/
please try and address everything rather than just focusing on one thing and dismissing the other relevant shit
and before u try strawman my argument into some technique is not the be all and end all def jux bs ill elaborate further
certain things r a given, of course rappers are gonna be on beat (hopefully) and of course they're gonna have lyrics and if they're lucky a nice delivery/"vocal presence"
once u get past these things u're gonna have to break them down further if you really wanna compare them unless you just wanna say boom everythings subjective no debate to be had
so to say that a reggae mc from the eighties who is really and truly only gonna have at best a strong delivery, strong charisma and medium lyrics
is better than an mc from the here and now who is either more well rounded or has the same level of delivery charisma and better lyrics
thats nonsense
further more wtf is ABILITY if not total rap tekkers
/
sneakbo pisses all over chuck d despite chuck having arguably (not imo) better "lyrics" (message)
luka suck ur mum
Last edited: