mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Nor is it decided by popularity with the voters.And it's cos the election is not decided by who has the bigger rally...
Nor is it decided by popularity with the voters.And it's cos the election is not decided by who has the bigger rally...
You could probably avoid a lot of this by just blocking @HMGovt’s Glorious Return!'s Twitter account though, I'd have thought?The decline must have been super fast to be so visible. But I'm a nosy person, in newspapers I like reading letters pages, and on twitter I used to love arguments, watching people just going at each other - but now it's just "your corrupt" "u r a trayter" and so on, it's not even fun to read.
Why you bully me?You could probably avoid a lot of this by just blocking @HMGovt’s Glorious Return!'s Twitter account though, I'd have thought?
Fact check: the world was more peaceful under Trump, and it may just be that having a President who, as his opponents regularly remind us, is a bit random makes it difficult for other movers and shakers to commit to big moves.One thing that is weird is how Trumpers keep talking about how the world was more peaceful under Trump. At first it seemed like a joke, his voters cheekily taking advantage of the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine while Biden was president and - fair enough - having a bit of fun with that. Why not?
But now it's like they've actually started believing it. Seems you repeat anything enough times - however dumb - and it becomes true for you. So you see people campaigning saying "Simple choice - world peace with Trump or wars everywhere under Biden". And then it hits you that some people literally think that Trump was somehow single-handedly preventing a war in Palestine. Of course these are people who couldn't find Israel on a map.... or Ukraine. Or Russia. In fact most of them probably couldn't find a map either so they have no problem dismissing them and all the useless info they might contain.
Basically they've decided that stuff is unimportant on a personal level cos Trump knows it all for them and he's standing there in the red and black sea holding back the Ukrainian leadership and preventing them marching their submarines into Jerusalem.
Are you denying the reality of American imperialism?"The world was more peaceful under [POTUS I liked] than it is under [POTUS I dislike]" is such a powerfully American way of looking at the world, even down to the word 'under.' Like it's impossible that any event anywhere couldn't be determined directly by events in the USA.
Maybe it's *kinda* true in a way - in that Trump reflected a very American tendency to isolationism, wants to pull out of NATO, wouldn't challenge Russia etc. Not sure about ME policy but more of the same even if he did blow up Solemani (stopped clocks etc).One thing that is weird is how Trumpers keep talking about how the world was more peaceful under Trump. At first it seemed like a joke, his voters cheekily taking advantage of the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine while Biden was president and - fair enough - having a bit of fun with that. Why not?
But now it's like they've actually started believing it. Seems you repeat anything enough times - however dumb - and it becomes true for you. So you see people campaigning saying "Simple choice - world peace with Trump or wars everywhere under Biden". And then it hits you that some people literally think that Trump was somehow single-handedly preventing a war in Palestine. Of course these are people who couldn't find Israel on a map.... or Ukraine. Or Russia. In fact most of them probably couldn't find a map either so they have no problem dismissing them and all the useless info they might contain.
Basically they've decided that stuff is unimportant on a personal level cos Trump knows it all for them and he's standing there in the red and black sea holding back the Ukrainian leadership and preventing them marching their submarines into Jerusalem.
…world events can have causes other than the USA?"The world was more peaceful under [POTUS I liked] than it is under [POTUS I dislike]" is such a powerfully American way of looking at the world, even down to the word 'under.' Like it's impossible that any event anywhere couldn't be determined directly by events in the USA.
I'm saying it's not the only political force in the world.Are you denying the reality of American imperialism?
Oh I'm sure a load of people about to a festival really put a lot of thought into how the White House would react.Fact check: the world was more peaceful under Trump, and it may just be that having a President who, as his opponents regularly remind us, is a bit random makes it difficult for other movers and shakers to commit to big moves.
And then it hits you that some people literally think that Trump was somehow single-handedly preventing a war in Palestine
Definitely his best field was the one in which he did absolutely nothing cos he had no interest in it or knowledge of it. Much how like @mixed_biscuits best performance is in the motorik thread.Maybe it's *kinda* true in a way - in that Trump reflected a very American tendency to isolationism, wants to pull out of NATO, wouldn't challenge Russia etc. Not sure about ME policy but more of the same even if he did blow up Solemani (stopped clocks etc).
Terrible statistic. The worst. Loser statistic. I know of 100 better statistics.if you go by purchasing power parity.
And I bet you've got a whole folder full of graphs all ready to prove this in great detail.Terrible statistic. The worst. Loser statistic. I know of 100 better statistics.
There was no warAs Trump's involvement would amount to trying to figure out where Israel is while juggling Putin's balls in his mouth I can't see a plausible argument for him somehow performing better.