pattycakes_
Can turn naughty
And I'd still like to know what you're most committed to
Sounds like a closet Phil Collins fan
Typically the deep is in opposition to sensation, to instinct,to excitement and the rush.
I am basically antagonistic towards the deep. Particularly when it seems to be acting as a synonym for the tasteful. the mature, restrained expression of refined feelings. That I consider to be anti-life.
it's another way of saying what gives life existential meaning beyond the material
pushing back against being swallowed up by the mundanities of day-to-day life
Where notions of the deep can be useful for me, is, as I keep coming back to, as slowness and deliberation and careful considered attention.
I enjoy speed. I enjoy operating at speed, mentally. I like formulating and articulating thought and impressions at speed but the danger lies in snatching at things. In coming to too sudden a conclusion. In being superficial.
In fact landscapes, nature, the outdoors tends to be where I look for this experience. Music for me is something else. As a city boy the country completely reprograms my nervous system. The effects are very profound. I think that is my version of listening to dj sprinkles. It's not depth though, it's space and time and tranquillity. Something falls into sync. The mind stops racing. The breath slows down. I'm a different person.
but generally, the minimalism allows the listener to project their own thoughts. The lack of meaning is what gives it depth. Its an empty vessel waiting to be filled.
Top thread. Going back to the original post - the search for transcendent moments becomes ever more important in a cultural environment that privileges words stripped bare to their literal meaning role. Dogged, unholy literalism everywhere, a world where the pre-lingual and the subconscious are intellectual concepts not visceral truths.
So the search for transcendence becomes a direct response, claiming back an ostracised and core aspect of the human experience. And music is one of the best enablers.
Aka why militant atheists/Rationality addicts are even worse -and madder-than religious maniacs.
and it's useful to think about how/why specific techniques of composition or production evoke depth
kind ofwhat im getting from you is this sense of the deep as something currently a step on the ziggurat up from our current level of comprehension/functioning.
That and a lot of 'race-memory' stuff. Correct?
it's really about the tension between lucidity and mysteryClassicism having a concern with lucidity and proportion
that's certainly trueBut there's terrors on either side, if you're just a hair out of alignment.