Keir Starmer
subvert47
I don't fight, I run away
Yes, I guess it is.
wild greens
Well-known member
Read that massive thread from last year about Starmer being an intelligence asset after the comment on the previous page. I do believe it all now but it is also interesting that they didn't select someone more capable, unless that's the point
wild greens
Well-known member
Well, believe is a strong term but it is automatically the most interesting thing about this whole mess
IdleRich
IdleRich
What time is the vote do we know?
john eden
male pale and stale
It probably will but is less certain now and we need to find our excitement where we can these days
It seems like the Tories are pivoting towards getting this one through and then the need for even more police powers to protect women. So I am sure that will all work out great. One wonders what level of protection statues of women will get?
Mr. Tea
Let's Talk About Ceps
If they're of Margaret Thatcher, it will presumably soon be compulsory to offer a profound salaam as you walk past, on pain of a public flogging.
Link?
What could possible go wrong? After all, a women is in charge of the Home Office now!It probably will but is less certain now and we need to find our excitement where we can these days
It seems like the Tories are pivoting towards getting this one through and then the need for even more police powers to protect women. So I am sure that will all work out great. One wonders what level of protection statues of women will get?
wild greens
Well-known member
Thread by @DCKennard: Why did then head of the CPS, Keir Starmer, meet then head of MI5, Sir Jonathan Evans, for informal social drinks in April 2013, the year af…
Thread by @DCKennard: Why did then head of the CPS, Keir Starmer, meet then head of MI5, Sir Jonathan Evans, for informal social drinks in Ap, the year after Starmer decided not to prosecute MI5 for its role in torture. No record any other CPS head accep…
threadreaderapp.com
Obviously all conjecture but it's nice to see someone make an effort
wild greens
Well-known member
It probably is all absolute shite- isn't everything just smoke and mirrors now- but things like the spycops bill etc do make sense within the narrative
Having now read this Kennard's timeline he does not seem like someone i would follow
Having now read this Kennard's timeline he does not seem like someone i would follow
The thing is some of it is probably bang on. Or at least it's interesting in itself like the meetings with The Times journalists. I'm glad all this stuff is recorded and the public can see it. But it's the inferences that lead from it i.e. he met this journalist and resigned two months later, like there's a casual link.