luka
Well-known member
to me it implies multiple timelines we can find ourelves shunted between (possibly depending on our actions)
Optimisation
- Thread starter luka
- Start date
to me it implies multiple timelines we can find ourelves shunted between (possibly depending on our actions)
constant escape
winter withered, warm
I tend to think of some kind of Nietzschean parallel-computing cosmos, wherein the state-of-being that you currently occupy is the iteration that hasn't died yet, so you could very well be going on forever. That said, I don't know much about parallel computing or Nietzsche's eternal return.
But I think the impact of a reality shift can effectively steer you into different timelines. Seeing as most people's realities rarely if ever shift, its as if their timeline is more or less determined, once their reality stabilizes/ossifies, that is.
But I think the impact of a reality shift can effectively steer you into different timelines. Seeing as most people's realities rarely if ever shift, its as if their timeline is more or less determined, once their reality stabilizes/ossifies, that is.
constant escape
winter withered, warm
If you can willfully inform and steer your reality, it would make one a veritable god.
I was just thinking about this yesterday. In order to appear to Alice as a god, you just need to know 1) her known known, 2) her known unknown, 3) some of her unknown unknown, and 4) some of her unknown known.
So the territory of the descriptor-known, the territory and fringe of the familiar, is a sort of donut-sphere, hollow at the center, which would be the unknown known, the unconscious. At the fringe of the outer cortex would be the known unknown, where you have a sense of what it is you should be getting to know, and beyond that fringe is the unknown unknown.
So registering as a god is an entirely relative matter. Any entity that registers to you as a god is merely a sufficient measure higher than you in terms of something like intelligence, maybe something to do with physical complexity.
Total pseudoscience, but I think bootstrapping oneself up this scale might have something to do with willfully guiding neuronal pathways, or somehow getting in touch with the operating system from which consciousness emerges. A sort of bootloader OS.
I was just thinking about this yesterday. In order to appear to Alice as a god, you just need to know 1) her known known, 2) her known unknown, 3) some of her unknown unknown, and 4) some of her unknown known.
So the territory of the descriptor-known, the territory and fringe of the familiar, is a sort of donut-sphere, hollow at the center, which would be the unknown known, the unconscious. At the fringe of the outer cortex would be the known unknown, where you have a sense of what it is you should be getting to know, and beyond that fringe is the unknown unknown.
So registering as a god is an entirely relative matter. Any entity that registers to you as a god is merely a sufficient measure higher than you in terms of something like intelligence, maybe something to do with physical complexity.
Total pseudoscience, but I think bootstrapping oneself up this scale might have something to do with willfully guiding neuronal pathways, or somehow getting in touch with the operating system from which consciousness emerges. A sort of bootloader OS.
constant escape
winter withered, warm
My go to and alphabetically privileged subject.
constant escape
winter withered, warm
Bob is next in line, before Carol. After that, your guess is as good as mine.
luka
Well-known member
i often think this too. we are alike in some ways but you know more long words.
sus
Moderator
"Exit, Voice, or Loyalty: choose your path, Modern Man"
sus
Moderator
not me I was born like yesterday
constant escape
winter withered, warm
Here to clean up the mess.
sus
Moderator
Not just the mess, their mess.
mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Is he talking about CV-building?
shiels
_
Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power by Byung-Chul Han – review
An examination of the internet age suggests that we should cultivate the heresies of secrets and silence
www.theguardian.com
linebaugh
Well-known member
I read this, it was alright. Some embarrassing Big Brother analogies but did a good job of succinctly tackling the subject, I liked the chapter on trafficking in feelings vs. emotionsPsychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power by Byung-Chul Han – review
An examination of the internet age suggests that we should cultivate the heresies of secrets and silence
