Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
At my level, I'd be getting 10% on stablecoins. But if I had $20,000,000 worth of USDT, maybe Nexo couldn't afford to pay me 2,000,000 USDT annually. More than that actually, taking variable compounding rates into account.
Well, they'd be able to pay one person that, definitely, but my point is I don't know how scalable their model is. I don't know if they could have a bunch of depositor accounts of that size.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
tether are already lending to nexo tho
I could be wrong, but I remember the Protos report just conveying that massive inflows of USDT were going into Nexo, but I'm not sure it necessarily means lending. Lending could be part of it, but so could transactions, say between NEXO token and USDT.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
I forget if the report has any evidence of NEXO token movements. It's all happening on Ethereum, so the records are there and public.
 

vimothy

yurp
I could be wrong, but I remember the Protos report just conveying that massive inflows of USDT were going into Nexo, but I'm not sure it necessarily means lending. Lending could be part of it, but so could transactions, say between NEXO token and USDT.
I see. well, some amount of that is obvs loans. but nexo will need to get that at a rate which is lower that that which its offering to its borrowers in order to make a profit
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
2.6 billion last year, according to that protos article
Of USDT yeah, but I'm talking about Nexo's own token, NEXO. Its possible that Nexo sent Tether a supply of NEXO in exchange for USDT, but this doesn't necessarily mean there isn't any lending going on. Could be a combo of both. Its also possible that Nexo acquired all $2.6 billon in USDT in exchange for NEXO tokens, as a sort of treasury swap.
 

vimothy

yurp
doesnt really matter what format the liabilities take, tether issue their liabilities and acquire as an asset nexos liabilities
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
doesnt really matter what format the liabilities take, tether issue their liabilities and acquire as an asset nexos liabilities
But this way, its not like Nexo building it's lending platform using borrowed capital, no? At least not to any significant degree. I could be wrong, but it seems like building this lending model on a pool of capital of which a significant portion is borrowed, seems less sustainable.
 

vimothy

yurp
if nexo are making loans then they're definitely borrowing to support them, nothing else makes sense from a bottom line business pov
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
if nexo are making loans then they're definitely borrowing to support them, nothing else makes sense from a bottom line business pov
Would it make sense to initially borrow just to bootstrap this business model, until they have enough capital, from lending revenue, to just cover the overhead of liquidity pools and lending? They're also able to dial up and down a variety of different rates and factors on the platform.
 

vimothy

yurp
i dont think so. if they want to make loans in USDT then they should borrow at favourable rates from tether and lend at higher ones, that's a model which scales
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
i dont think so. if they want to make loans in USDT then they should borrow at favourable rates from tether and lend at higher ones, that's a model which scales
Yeah they'd be lending at way higher rates, considering how high the depositor interest rates are. But yeah that makes sense to me. Nexo could be borrowing USDT at a rate of maybe 1-3%, if not even lower, depending on what the size of the loan is.
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
And so ultimately the financial growth of Nexo's business model seems predicated on A) overall appreciation of assets in the market, and/or B) the financial success of borrowers who take out a loan and manage to repay it plus interest without collateral liquidation, and/or C) leveraged borrowers getting liquidated and losing more than their initial loan value.
 

vimothy

yurp
in the tether papers article (did you post that, btw? it's really good), they seem to think theres some ambiguity about whether usdt is fully backed, which seems crazy to me. what tether are doing could not be more obvious.
 
Top