Well, they'd be able to pay one person that, definitely, but my point is I don't know how scalable their model is. I don't know if they could have a bunch of depositor accounts of that size.At my level, I'd be getting 10% on stablecoins. But if I had $20,000,000 worth of USDT, maybe Nexo couldn't afford to pay me 2,000,000 USDT annually. More than that actually, taking variable compounding rates into account.
I could be wrong, but I remember the Protos report just conveying that massive inflows of USDT were going into Nexo, but I'm not sure it necessarily means lending. Lending could be part of it, but so could transactions, say between NEXO token and USDT.tether are already lending to nexo tho
I see. well, some amount of that is obvs loans. but nexo will need to get that at a rate which is lower that that which its offering to its borrowers in order to make a profitI could be wrong, but I remember the Protos report just conveying that massive inflows of USDT were going into Nexo, but I'm not sure it necessarily means lending. Lending could be part of it, but so could transactions, say between NEXO token and USDT.
Of USDT yeah, but I'm talking about Nexo's own token, NEXO. Its possible that Nexo sent Tether a supply of NEXO in exchange for USDT, but this doesn't necessarily mean there isn't any lending going on. Could be a combo of both. Its also possible that Nexo acquired all $2.6 billon in USDT in exchange for NEXO tokens, as a sort of treasury swap.2.6 billion last year, according to that protos article
But this way, its not like Nexo building it's lending platform using borrowed capital, no? At least not to any significant degree. I could be wrong, but it seems like building this lending model on a pool of capital of which a significant portion is borrowed, seems less sustainable.doesnt really matter what format the liabilities take, tether issue their liabilities and acquire as an asset nexos liabilities
Yeah I'd be surprised if they weren't at all, but I'd also be surprised, and obviously alarmed, if their liquidity pools are largely comprised of borrowed funds.nexo is 100% using leverage
Yeah its really one of the primary sources for Nexo's profit: people taking out loans and immediately putting themselves in leveraged positions.everyone is
Would it make sense to initially borrow just to bootstrap this business model, until they have enough capital, from lending revenue, to just cover the overhead of liquidity pools and lending? They're also able to dial up and down a variety of different rates and factors on the platform.if nexo are making loans then they're definitely borrowing to support them, nothing else makes sense from a bottom line business pov
Yeah they'd be lending at way higher rates, considering how high the depositor interest rates are. But yeah that makes sense to me. Nexo could be borrowing USDT at a rate of maybe 1-3%, if not even lower, depending on what the size of the loan is.i dont think so. if they want to make loans in USDT then they should borrow at favourable rates from tether and lend at higher ones, that's a model which scales