luka
Well-known member
My assumption is that it was intended as a sales pitch. Unless he's stupider than he looks.It probably came across like a sales pitch.
My assumption is that it was intended as a sales pitch. Unless he's stupider than he looks.It probably came across like a sales pitch.
Here.
This is the stuff I found really scary,
If "the info-tech revolution merges with the bio-tech revolution what you get is the ability to hack human beings."
"once we have algorithms that can understand me better than I understand myself they could predict my desires manipulate my emotions & even take decisions on my behalf. & if we are not careful, the outcome might be, the rise of digital dictatorships."
"people will give up their privacy in exchange for healthcare and maybe in many places they won't have a choice. They won't even get insurance if they're unwilling to give access to what is happening inside their bodies."
This formulation or argument in itself is pretty trivial or circular or just lame though isn't it? It pretty much says "Humans are just compurwes so they are just computers".this man is becoming a familair face in the conspiracy channel broadcasts. he reminds me of Stan and Gus in that he doesn't so much think as articulate the premises the modern world is built upon. these things are not always spelled out so clearly and where they are they fit neatly into a conspiratorial framework
for example
Historian Yuval Noah Harari offers a bracing prediction: just as mass industrialization created the working class, the AI revolution will create a new unworking class.
1. Organisms are algorithms. Every animal — including Homo sapiens — is an assemblage of organic algorithms shaped by natural selection over millions of years of evolution.
2. Algorithmic calculations are not affected by the materials from which the calculator is built. Whether an abacus is made of wood, iron or plastic, two beads plus two beads equals four beads.
3. Hence, there is no reason to think that organic algorithms can do things that non-organic algorithms will never be able to replicate or surpass. As long as the calculations remain valid, what does it matter whether the algorithms are manifested in carbon or silicon?
Oh ok that's the same point as mine I guess. He's just picked one side of the debate and stated it as fact, ignoring the less trendy side.he channels the ideology of the era without any conscious intervention. a mouthpiece for impersonal forces. this is why he is important.... from what i can work out... not having read anything he's written or listened to any interviews etc.
2. Algorithmic calculations are not affected by the materials from which the calculator is built. Whether an abacus is made of wood, iron or plastic, two beads plus two beads equals four beads.
Nah, what are they?
Already initiated, re: psychographic machine learning.
The metaverse as macroconsumer.he's behind the curve
dreamspace secured
adverts inserted
revenue generated
Did someone here share the reports of Peter Thiel wanting to monopolize the astral plane? Unsure if that is true, but even if it is I have my doubts as to its feasibility. Then again, I know very little about the astral plane.