mvuent

Void Dweller
i hope the original posts were at least clear enough that they didn't give people the impression that rattling off genre names (is modular synth really a genre?) was the ultimate goal of this thread. organizing subgenres into a bigger picture according to sliding scales like the ones i proposed would be more like it.
 

woops

is not like other people
i hope the original posts were at least clear enough that they didn't give people the impression that rattling off genre names (is modular synth really a genre?) was the ultimate goal of this thread.
i think there probably is a modular synth gene oddly enough but it only encompasses a certain kind of 20 minute "generative" track, wibbly drone based modular music. other styles are available
 

Slothrop

Tight but Polite
The first two binaries / sliding scales that sprung to mind were electronic vs acoustic and clarity vs blurriness. Where each of those is probably conflating a few other ideas, so "acoustic" covers both the sound quality of acoustic instruments but also the "feel" of live playing, and "clarity" simultaneously refers to clarity of tone, pitch and music gesture.

I thought a bit about soothing vs unsettling but I don't thing that really works as a sliding scale - something can have soothing and unsettling elements in tension and be quite different from something that's just sort-of neutral. You maybe want something more like a mood wheel for that, with independent axes for, say, calm, ecstatic, melancholic, unsettling, cinematic, playful etc.

Is this a helpful direction?
 

blissblogger

Well-known member
"audio animation" is a great way of looking at music generally (especially electronic but not exclusively)

ambient, though, feels like it might be one kind of music where it has less traction - simply because the music is not very animated in the sense of motion and liveliness.

in a spiritual sense much of it is aspiring to the grace of the inanimate

probably ambient is more like (at its worse) a screensaver and (at its best) a mandala

also certainly kinds of visual art - Rothko... Monet's Waterlilies was a big one for Eno

I also often think of things like mobiles - the Calder kind but also the type that gyrate very slowly above a child's crib.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
Dockstader

Song is really off its axis. Academy meets Ashram. Vertiginous. Upwards! Wait, wtf is happening, did you dose me?

 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
Re-editing terrible shows like the Mormon-fest sponsored Skinwalker Ranch with such music is necessary. Bit too Chris Morris admittedly. Instead of UFO’s, they investigate ambient. All the caffeinated adhd jump cutting stays but leave the music playing, like the broadcast itself is on heroin

Cartographically too - Utah, mesas, some fuckin triangle, terrible crimes against chinos, hats and beards and for the entire show certain tracks are playing


71701848-62EC-4DBD-A43E-93EDE1C296C0.jpeg
41AB05B7-FBB5-44F6-89D0-082251759EB0.jpeg
0AAFF5F4-085D-4233-8C5F-0A7415E29944.jpeg
A74C8116-CECF-420F-903B-DAD721496B71.jpeg
387C6DB2-0238-4B9B-9834-B0CD8836E0F5.jpeg
7BBA4B06-4B8F-4E8A-8BA0-97C4077B9238.jpeg

all at 1.6 ghz
 

mvuent

Void Dweller
The first two binaries / sliding scales that sprung to mind were electronic vs acoustic and clarity vs blurriness. Where each of those is probably conflating a few other ideas, so "acoustic" covers both the sound quality of acoustic instruments but also the "feel" of live playing, and "clarity" simultaneously refers to clarity of tone, pitch and music gesture.

I thought a bit about soothing vs unsettling but I don't thing that really works as a sliding scale - something can have soothing and unsettling elements in tension and be quite different from something that's just sort-of neutral. You maybe want something more like a mood wheel for that, with independent axes for, say, calm, ecstatic, melancholic, unsettling, cinematic, playful etc.
clarity vs blurriness is great. definitely an essential addition. i agree soothing vs unsettling can be so multifaceted, the way i tend to sort of consolidate disparate emotional impressions is by asking: would i want to live there, in a place with that atmosphere? sometime i find that the music has an unsettling quality but it's so lush that i'd still say yes.

acoustic vs electronic is probably getting to the heart of what this is about, for me. thinking about it not so much in terms of the nature of the sounds produced as what they evoke. so acoustic meaning, like you said, "live playing"—music that sounds like a dude playing an instrument; electronic meaning audio animation—music that sounds like an imaginary environment. in more formal terms you might say that acoustic is all about traditional melody and harmony whereas audio animation makes greater use of timbre and space. (hopefully i'm riffing off what you said and not going completely in a different direction...)

it seems like ambient musicians often approach what they're doing on very traditional terms. they see themselves as a performer when their music would be more interesting if they saw themselves as, idk, a movie director or a mage something. so imo, "advanced" ambient moves beyond that.

"audio animation" is a great way of looking at music generally (especially electronic but not exclusively)

ambient, though, feels like it might be one kind of music where it has less traction - simply because the music is not very animated in the sense of motion and liveliness.

in a spiritual sense much of it is aspiring to the grace of the inanimate

probably ambient is more like (at its worse) a screensaver and (at its best) a mandala

also certainly kinds of visual art - Rothko... Monet's Waterlilies was a big one for Eno

I also often think of things like mobiles - the Calder kind but also the type that gyrate very slowly above a child's crib.
i suppose music doesn't need to be that lively to work as audio animation? evoking relaxing, graceful, somnolent motions like the migration of clouds, fog rolling in, or yeah on the really low end a screensaver, is fair game surely.

but you're right, my main interest is the "edge cases": to borrow droid's dichotomy, stuff that's unusually kinetic for ashram music and stuff that's unusually lush for academy music. an example of "advanced ambient" on the former end would be like tetsu inoue, who started off very culturally aligned with all the music for nodding off after raves stuff but was always as brilliant an audio animator as the best electroacoustic composers. an example on the latter end would be later francois bayle, who by the 90s and 00s had left behind the shrill tinnitus synths he'd used in the early 70s and was using the same sort of lush "cyber gaia" synth pads appearing in ambient around the same time, albeit in a much more active way.


imo this is a great synthesis of ambient and electroacoustic values into lush audio animation. a sort of parmegiani-esque compostional structure of having sounds moving violently in and out of a more stable "continuum" that subtly changes in their wake. evokes being in a wide open space on another planet, peripheral ufos careening through the atmosphere.
 

mvuent

Void Dweller
reposting my vangelis rant in case any irate fans of his are here this time and want to argue:
tough to access the legacy of artists like this (and jean michel jarre, klauz schultz) because what made them good was essentially that they were complete fucking oblivious idiots. the earlier modernists were sharp enough to realize that electronic music afforted new compositional possibilities, had the potential to drastically differ from what came before in terms of how it was both heard and composed, but the results of all their work were often abstruse and unsensual. on the other hand, it never even occurred to people like vangelis that they should do anything with the new tech but what was most obvious, what it had already been drilled into their heads that musicians should do: namely, noodle around on a standard tuning keyboard until they'd arrived at a few pleasant tonal chord progressions and melodies. this worked out because, as suspended has talked about, traditions often exist for a good reason, and to western ears simple tonal music is often pleasant and easy to emotionally access. but the "futuristic" qualities in this music that mean so much to the over 40s who were blown away by blade runner or whatever as kids are entirely to the credit of the people who designed the tech itself. not the egotists who saw electronic music as piano playing with a few extra bells and whistles added. vangelis et al were simply lucky enough to get there before the millions of people who make comparable music now. tbf they were no doubt also a bit more naturally gifted, a bit more industrious as well. but still. their music is a glorified synth demo. there was no lateral thinking involved, they just had to decide which chord to hold down after selecting a preset. before and after his death vangelis has been touted as this "visionary" but he was the complete fucking opposite, a complacent unthinking conduit of his time.

tl;dr i'm sure if i dug into his back catalogue i'd find some music by vangelis i liked, but i know he wasn't an Audio Animator, he wasn't a genius.
 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
A minute of mercy and ambiguities, between 5-6 minute stamp, ideally looped for much longer (before the shrill noise enters)

 

WashYourHands

Cat Malogen
The whole dark ambient phrase is a crime and conceals, rather than reveals, ambiguous moods. Tyranny of painful dross too. A more pertinent pointer might be


He could probably rewrite his blurb without so much allusion to landscapes and blackballing graphics, yet the way LYC catches and augments submerged sounds under extreme ocean travelling vessels at different depths, tips sections into the uncanny. It can be a weirdly cosy world too



He did another, Twyll Du, which does a different take incorporating a lake. Bypass the writing


Not that field recordings are cartimantic references in themselves, more of an Alan Splet style nuance for capturing elemental sound features. I can stay for an hour or so in such realms, surveying what compliments, before moving on
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
reposting my vangelis rant in case any irate fans of his are here this time and want to argue:

Yeah, sorry, this is bollocks.

Albedo 0.39 is probably the culmination of bizarro electronic prog rock, next to a few others, Heldon etc.

Although as a Marxist I don't accept the concept of genius as definitionally valid so I won't get involved in that debate.
 
Last edited:

mvuent

Void Dweller
haha i figured posting the orb would ruffle your feathers, for some reason. that orb track is full of what francois bayle would call i-sounds, and these sounds move very freely in "a cinema for the ear" kind of way. the more traditionally sequenced hook is just sort a floating, morphing element. it's not sophisticated work of audio animation exactly but it is a brilliant one.
 

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
haha i figured posting the orb would ruffle your feathers, for some reason. that orb track is full of what francois bayle would call i-sounds, and these sounds move very freely in "a cinema for the ear" kind of way. the more traditionally sequenced hook is just sort a floating, morphing element. it's not sophisticated work of audio animation exactly but it is a brilliant one.

Oh I really like it. I just don't understand how you can trash vangelis and post that, when they're just an updated version of what V was doing in the 70s.
 
Top