What aspect of his stories is it that needs to be sanitized? I understand he was a massive antisemite, but I don't recall there being potentially offensive stuff in his books - unless it's "body-shaming" in The Twits, something like that?The Roald Dahl thing's a bit grim. Apparently Netflix own the rights to his stuff and want to turn it into another franchise, so they've hired people to sanitise it as much as possible.
Or, as the old joke has it:I guess the reasoning is that by shaping the language you shape the thinking, but it can also feel superficial. I don't get the impression a big company hiring a DEI consultant to throw a bunch of jargon at a roomful of disinterested adults is really doing much to improve society, particularly now that there's evidence of this stuff being used against unionisation efforts.
You've even got The Guardian / Observer publishing writers pulling away from it now.
Focusing on diversity means we miss the big picture. It’s class that shapes our lives | Kenan Malik
In shifting our gaze from equality, we lose sight of the most marginalisedwww.theguardian.com
Equality and diversity are not, however, synonymous. Even as societies and institutions have become more diverse, many have also become more unequal. What has been created, Reed sardonically observes, is a “moral economy” in which “a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be [regarded as] just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people”.
Out of interest, can someone explain to me the difference between 'equality' and 'equity'? It's just that I always thought the latter meant how much of (say) a house or a company someone owned, but in the last couple of years, people (mainly Americans, I think) have begun using them as synonyms, or maybe near-synonyms with some subtle distinction that I don't get.I guess the reasoning is that by shaping the language you shape the thinking, but it can also feel superficial. I don't get the impression a big company hiring a DEI consultant to throw a bunch of jargon at a roomful of disinterested adults is really doing much to improve society, particularly now that there's evidence of this stuff being used against unionisation efforts.
You've even got The Guardian / Observer publishing writers pulling away from it now.
Focusing on diversity means we miss the big picture. It’s class that shapes our lives | Kenan Malik
In shifting our gaze from equality, we lose sight of the most marginalisedwww.theguardian.com
Equality and diversity are not, however, synonymous. Even as societies and institutions have become more diverse, many have also become more unequal. What has been created, Reed sardonically observes, is a “moral economy” in which “a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be [regarded as] just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people”.
Those CIA ads felt like an SNL skit.
Those CIA ads felt like an SNL skit.
I've been telling you for years that the CIA is run by human beings.
I think it's because they're both really annoying.Nobody seems to have gotten to the bottom of why fairly trivial things seem to rile people up that much more than serious ones in general, mind you. Why does Piers Morgan or Owen Jones tweeting something trump the price of food or petrol? Is it the duration of the irritant? The facelessness of the broader issues? You could try to argue it's due to a sense of powerlessness in the face of something like food prices, but getting angry at Morgan or Jones doesn't really do anything either, even if you tweet something at them.
Maybe the 'F' doesn't stand for 'friendly' after all...Me, reading Roald Dahl to my kids, only I've black marker penned back in the mildly offensive stuff and red marker penned in additional, even more offensive, stuff, the BFG lecturing Sophie re: the great replacement, he refers to the Jews as 'creepsome schnozzfuzzlers', etcetera