Woke

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
The Roald Dahl thing's a bit grim. Apparently Netflix own the rights to his stuff and want to turn it into another franchise, so they've hired people to sanitise it as much as possible.
What aspect of his stories is it that needs to be sanitized? I understand he was a massive antisemite, but I don't recall there being potentially offensive stuff in his books - unless it's "body-shaming" in The Twits, something like that?
 

Benny Bunter

Well-known member
Lol, they got rid of the word 'ugly' in the twits, but presumably not the illustrations? (Or the whole the fucking point of the story)

images.jpeg
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
I have to wonder if the promoters of this sort of programme think that if they persist for long enough, we'll eventually live in a society in which nobody, no matter how unattractive or eccentric, is regarded as unattractive or eccentric?
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
I guess the reasoning is that by shaping the language you shape the thinking, but it can also feel superficial. I don't get the impression a big company hiring a DEI consultant to throw a bunch of jargon at a roomful of disinterested adults is really doing much to improve society, particularly now that there's evidence of this stuff being used against unionisation efforts.

You've even got The Guardian / Observer publishing writers pulling away from it now.


Equality and diversity are not, however, synonymous. Even as societies and institutions have become more diverse, many have also become more unequal. What has been created, Reed sardonically observes, is a “moral economy” in which “a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be [regarded as] just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people”.
Or, as the old joke has it:

Conservatives say it's fine that 10 people own half the world's wealth.
Socialists say "No it isn't."
Liberals say "FIVE OF THOSE PEOPLE SHOULD BE WOMEN!"
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
I guess the reasoning is that by shaping the language you shape the thinking, but it can also feel superficial. I don't get the impression a big company hiring a DEI consultant to throw a bunch of jargon at a roomful of disinterested adults is really doing much to improve society, particularly now that there's evidence of this stuff being used against unionisation efforts.

You've even got The Guardian / Observer publishing writers pulling away from it now.


Equality and diversity are not, however, synonymous. Even as societies and institutions have become more diverse, many have also become more unequal. What has been created, Reed sardonically observes, is a “moral economy” in which “a society in which 1% of the population controlled 90% of the resources could be [regarded as] just, provided that roughly 12% of the 1% were black, 12% were Latino, 50% were women and whatever the appropriate proportions were LGBT people”.
Out of interest, can someone explain to me the difference between 'equality' and 'equity'? It's just that I always thought the latter meant how much of (say) a house or a company someone owned, but in the last couple of years, people (mainly Americans, I think) have begun using them as synonyms, or maybe near-synonyms with some subtle distinction that I don't get.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Nobody seems to have gotten to the bottom of why fairly trivial things seem to rile people up that much more than serious ones in general, mind you. Why does Piers Morgan or Owen Jones tweeting something trump the price of food or petrol? Is it the duration of the irritant? The facelessness of the broader issues? You could try to argue it's due to a sense of powerlessness in the face of something like food prices, but getting angry at Morgan or Jones doesn't really do anything either, even if you tweet something at them.
I think it's because they're both really annoying.
 

Leo

Well-known member
Media makes money from clicks, so they focus on outrage because it gets the eyeballs. if it bleeds, it leads. no one tunes in throughout the day to get the latest update on moderate policy or sensible debate cuz who cares. and yeah, older people have more time to sit in front of Fox News (or GB or whatever online) all day, but at the same time young people live on twitter and also immersed in the controversy du jour.
 

Corpsey

bandz ahoy
Me, reading Roald Dahl to my kids, only I've black marker penned back in the mildly offensive stuff and red marker penned in additional, even more offensive, stuff, the BFG lecturing Sophie re: the great replacement, he refers to the Jews as 'creepsome schnozzfuzzlers', etcetera
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
Me, reading Roald Dahl to my kids, only I've black marker penned back in the mildly offensive stuff and red marker penned in additional, even more offensive, stuff, the BFG lecturing Sophie re: the great replacement, he refers to the Jews as 'creepsome schnozzfuzzlers', etcetera
Maybe the 'F' doesn't stand for 'friendly' after all...
 
Top