mixed_biscuits

_________________________
No it's because the vast majority of non-bigots can see the plethora of empirical evidence supporting Butler's view. I also think it's far from an insullt to call someone like you, who denies the existence of transgender people, a bigot. That's more like an accurate description on my part.
See, you can't stop yourself.
 

malelesbian

Femboyism IS feminism.
And you said you don't care that you're not a thinker rather than a drone - that's pretty telling
I'm a drone but you're a troll among trolls. A whole board full of trolls considers you the biggest troll. Maybe that would be an accomplishment if it weren't so pathetic.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
I'm a drone but you're a troll among trolls. A whole board full of trolls considers you the biggest troll. Maybe that would be an accomplishment if it weren't so pathetic.
The only reason you're feeling got-at is because your arguments are very get-at-able; go back to the drawing board and you'll meet with more success
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
@malelesbian look at how eg. terms like 'sex', 'gender', 'essentialism' are defined and used in other disciplines beyond your niche of interest; most people don't live on planet malelesbian
 

malelesbian

Femboyism IS feminism.
@malelesbian look at how eg. terms like 'sex', 'gender', 'essentialism' are defined and used in other disciplines beyond your niche of interest; most people don't live on planet malelesbian
Why don't you read Butler or any feminism or gender theory at all? I don't think it's controversial to accept the definition of gender provided by gender theory.
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Why don't you read Butler or any feminism or gender theory at all? I don't think it's controversial to accept the definition of gender provided by gender theory.
a) I have read some b) of course it's controversial: not least because you don't accept its implications for transracialism, among other things...even you find it controversial when it's applied beyond the cliche!
 

malelesbian

Femboyism IS feminism.
Maybe get your ducks in order so that you aren't disagreeing with yourself within the space of one post first?
Do you know what exegetical scorekeeping is? It's a bad argument familiar to most academic philosophers. When you're just looking for inconsistencies and contradictions in your opponent's argument rather than actually giving a counter-argument, that's exegetical score-keeping. And the majority of academic philosophers consider it a bad, uncharitable argument. But then I wouldn't be suprised if you don't know what interpretative charity is either.
 

malelesbian

Femboyism IS feminism.
a) I have read some b) of course it's controversial: not least because you don't accept its implications for transracialism, among other things...even you find it controversial when it's applied beyond the cliche!
But again I refuted your argument for transracialism. It relies on an equivocation between cultural identity and race. You never responded to that argument.
 
Top