Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
but then some dickhead will post a video of Blackpool and whine how we have it worst
"Sure, the lack of basic healthcare for millions, constant mass shootings, rollback of women's reproductive rights and the inexorable rise of Christofascism are bad, but have you seen a really rough 'Spoons at chucking out time?"
 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
"Sure, the lack of basic healthcare for millions, constant mass shootings, rollback of women's reproductive rights and the inexorable rise of Christofascism are bad, but have you seen a really rough 'Spoons at chucking out time?"
But 'spoons has all those other things too.
 

luka

Well-known member
a lot of people say vile deserts give rise to monotheism dont they. but i cant recall the reasoning.
 

luka

Well-known member
an example

The dichotomy is between people who live in rainforests and those who live in deserts. Mbuti pygmies versus Middle Eastern bedouins. Amazonian Indians versus nomads of the Sahara or the Gobi. The sorts of cultures they generate have some consistent and permeating differences.

Some starters about religious belief. Who are the polytheistic animists, who are the monotheists? That one's easy. Rainforest dwellers specialise in a proliferation of spirits and gods, whereas monotheism was an invention of the desert. This makes sense. Deserts teach big singular things, like how tough a world it is, a world reduced to simple, furnace-blasted basics. "I am the Lord your God" and "There is but one God and his name is Allah" - diktats like these proliferate. In contrast, think of tropical rainforest people, in a world with a thousand different kinds of edible plants, where you can find more different species of ants on a single tree than you would find in all the British Isles. Letting a thousand deities bloom in the same sort of equilibrium must seem the most natural thing in the world.
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
a lot of people say vile deserts give rise to monotheism dont they. but i cant recall the reasoning.
I think Jonathan Meades has touched on this, but it's probably been observed by others before him.

Something about forests, marshes and grasslands being the natural home of all kinds of sprites and dryads and whatnot, whereas in the desert, there's just the overbearing totality of the sun - sun-worship being prototypical of monotheism.

 

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
an example

The dichotomy is between people who live in rainforests and those who live in deserts. Mbuti pygmies versus Middle Eastern bedouins. Amazonian Indians versus nomads of the Sahara or the Gobi. The sorts of cultures they generate have some consistent and permeating differences.

Some starters about religious belief. Who are the polytheistic animists, who are the monotheists? That one's easy. Rainforest dwellers specialise in a proliferation of spirits and gods, whereas monotheism was an invention of the desert. This makes sense. Deserts teach big singular things, like how tough a world it is, a world reduced to simple, furnace-blasted basics. "I am the Lord your God" and "There is but one God and his name is Allah" - diktats like these proliferate. In contrast, think of tropical rainforest people, in a world with a thousand different kinds of edible plants, where you can find more different species of ants on a single tree than you would find in all the British Isles. Letting a thousand deities bloom in the same sort of equilibrium must seem the most natural thing in the world.
It's because there are more spirits in the forest obv.
 

0bleak

Well-known member
hmm, off the top of my head - native americans in the desert parts of the americas (there are deserts)
australian aboriginals
 

0bleak

Well-known member
I watch charliebo313 and then exclaim to my friends "they call themselves first world"


That's not a dirt road - that's basically a decaying infrastructure in an economically hard hit town
cherry-picking an area like that would be like if I went to modern Times Square and said that is how the rest of country is
 

yyaldrin

in je ogen waait de wind
There's something debilitating about the kind of environmental decay seen in Britain at the moment. I think it's to do with the pace of decline. If something's destroyed overnight then there's a galvanising factor that promotes rebuilding and collective action. People club together in a crisis. The environment demands it. But when it unfolds over the course of decades, there's a weary resignation.

It's the difference between your house being damp and your house being flooded. One requires immediate and drastic action, the other tends to be ignored or managed.

Britain is a damp house.

 
Top