Interesting images, Sufi.
The uneasiness and ambiguity I've always had with most [not all, but most] Graffiti is its, perhaps unwitting, political regressiveness: most Graffiti tends to be confined to public spaces, with the frequent result that such spaces become further ghettoised, no-go areas, eventually becoming cheap pickings for property speculators to move in - with full local authority support - and privatise those same spaces [a socio-economic process that has been occurring almost everywhere for decades].
Like this, by Banksy:
"A mural of two Hollywood actors toting bananas instead of guns was widely considered to be one of London’s finest examples of graffiti art by the artist Banksy.
But not everyone, it appears, recognised the artistic merits of the portrait of John Travolta and Samuel L Jackson - a reworking of their roles in Pulp Fiction - near Old Street Tube station in east London.
The mural has been painted over by cleaners believed to be working for Transport for London. A TfL statement said a “tough line” had to be taken on graffiti because it created an “atmosphere of neglect and social decay which encourages crime”. The statement continued: “We have no intention of changing this policy as it makes the transport system safer and more pleasant for passengers. We recognise that there are those who view Banksy’s work as legitimate art, but sadly our graffiti removal teams are staffed by professional cleaners, not professional art critics."
More ...
Which is why the best Graffiti is invariably that which instead colonises
private spaces ...
[THIS is hilarious: "
Environmental Health Officers have however recently been given powers under the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003 to serve Defacement Removal Notices. These Notices give the owners or occupiers of private property 28 days to remove graffiti. If the Notice is not complied with, the person commits a criminal offence, and it allows the Council to remove the graffiti in default, and reclaim the costs in doing so."]
Graffiti Walls in Baghdad - young Iraqis write graffiti on an American barricade. [youtube video]
"Store owners in Chicago are outraged over a new, more destructive type of graffiti in which vandals use acid to burn images into their buildings and windows.Police said “acid tagging” has appeared on a number of stores.The acid is so strong that it etches the glass, the report said.Unlike regular paint, which can be power-washed or painted over, there’s really no way to get rid of this acid except to replace the glass.”And you can see if you look at it and feel it too, it’s like really burnt into the glass,” store owner Phil Angotti said. “You can actually feel with your finger. It’s actually etched in deeply into the glass.”Steve Lipshutz has already replaced all the windows on his hardware store once this year and the vandals came back.Lipshutz says police couldn’t do anything about it because nobody saw the vandals in the act.3M plans to offer a new Scotchguard film to protect windows from acid tagging.Lipshutz is considering the treatment because replacing the glass at his store costs almost $1,000."