I think you're saying almost the same thing as me here. But by 'exoticist pastiche' I meant appropriation purely for exotic effect to evoke some kind of ethnic otherness. The most common example I think of is getting some bloke to mutter something about Rastafari in a dance tune just because it'll add a little ethnic spice and vague oppositionality to a track, not because the producer has any relationship to the faith. (Based only on the few lines quoted here, it seems that Sherburne is painting all of dubstep with this brush.) Speaking just in musical terms, think of the music in that travel show 'Lonely Planet.' No matter where they are in the world, the 'ethnic music' starts up first, and then, every time, it magically morphs into a very standard 4/4, apirational, techno tune around 130 BPM. It's grabbing something foreign, cutting off the parts that stick out and slipping it into a box they made before they got there. 'Something more organic' was my lazy way of distinguishing this sort of artifice from any number of ways that music and musicians engage the everyday cultural influences that surround them. I'm not talking about any sort of essential ethnic link but the interfacing of cultures, where they inform eachother and can start to become one another. One of the things that I find exciting about a scene like dubstep, or jungle or hardcore in the 90s, is the way that music creates a field where these absolute ideas about ethnicity, race and origins are broken down and newness springs up. Dubstep has both tendencies going on, but given the intense multiculture of a city like London, I think it's rash to suggest that it's merely Orientalising rather than reflecting what its makers see and hear everyday. And it doesn't have to be all about London. Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto, Sydney - loads of places have this sort of intense cultural mixing going on and it's bound to lead to tracks that don't sound like we expect the producers to look.