infinite thought said:But this is all dodgy cultural-markers stuff. I suspect you mean like actual fetishes, men who can't get it up unless they're dressed as a baby or something.
mms said:I met a guy recently who writes scripts for a certain fetish where scenarios are set up so that men are naked in front of clothed women, so he writes these mini plays where this is always the end result.
Apparently fetish wise it's a real winner as it is enjoyed across the board both by gender and sexuality, personally i couldn't believe it was that simple.
mms said:I met a guy recently who writes scripts for a certain fetish where scenarios are set up so that men are naked in front of clothed women, so he writes these mini plays where this is always the end result.
Apparently fetish wise it's a real winner as it is enjoyed across the board both by gender and sexuality, personally i couldn't believe it was that simple.
john eden said:I always thought it was quite depressing that London "fetish clubs" seemed so reductive - i.e. mainly dressing up in a bit of leather or rubber (or even "goths in their pants"
martin said:Yes yes, but what's your kink then?
Ned said:I read an interview in the Guardian with some 60s Hammer horror film director who admitted that he was aroused by seeing blonde women wearing blood-stained white dresses, so he'd worked that into every film he ever made.
john eden said:I always thought it was quite depressing that London "fetish clubs" seemed so reductive - i.e. mainly dressing up in a bit of leather or rubber (or even "goths in their pants" as my mate put it), or a bit of whipping.
I guess that's because fetishes tend towards specialisation, which is difficult to cater for in a (largish) club environment?
I mean, yes, you'd get the same bloke coming along everytime dressed entirely in clingfilm and the odd trannie, but it all seemed a bit neatly compartmentalised to me. A mate of mine was turned away by the door staff for wearing slightly odd clothes which weren't yer obvious black/tight/rubber...