You need to destroy to create.
Affliate, disaffliate, kill again.
no, I meant Brooklyn too. not Williamsburg either, like Sunset Park & Park Slope & Bushwick & all this. tho I dunno if those are the "good" parts of Brooklyn or whatever, I'm not super familiar.
never been to the Bronx except for Mott Haven a few times but it was fine. I think speaking Spanish helps in some places.
oi Nomad!
i'll have you know i got mugged in Manhattan once!
i admit i was pissed, it was about 3 or 4 in the morning, down a side alley in a dodgy part of east Harlem, mind you, and bearing in mind i've been taxed about a million times in broad daylight in my native Manchester (where i allegedly know where i'm going).
(dunno why i called out N on this; she knows i wuv her)
Typically, men catch less shit and have less to worry about anywhere than women do.
Sunset Park is maybe my favorite neighborhood in Brooklyn but it's not that nice. Bushwick (the western parts where you're probably thinking of)...
For example, the cities in upstate NY are far far scarier than NYC in a lot of ways. There are 0 rich people up here, and only poor people, living in former industrial centers.
Rochester > Manhattan in scariness.
nah that's not quite true. well I mean almost anywhere is scarier than Manhattan, alright.
but I have been to Buffalo, Syracuse, Albany, etc. and yeah there's tons of abandoned, rundown stuff but none of them are particularly frightening. Albany especially is pretty nice. I mean all of them have downtown commercial districts and (esp. the ones w/colleges) hipster neighborhoods & even solid working class neighborhoods and bad parts, like any city. and suburbs, where the rich people live. I've also spent a lot of time in Pittsburgh, which is pretty vibrant despite being a half-deserted Rust Belt city. the Rust Belt feeling I get is more of despair, melancholy, bitterness, etc. than simmering anger. tho I'm sure that's an undercurrent as well.
tho I've never been to Rochester, so I guess it could be utterly terrifying for all I know.
Last year, Rochester's murder rate was about 25 per 100,000 people, says Klofas. New York City's rate: less than 6 per 100,000.
well of course. didn't mean to suggest otherwise. thought I mentioned that as matter of fact but maybe I didn't.
my point was more that I think the "scariness" or whatever you want to call it of American inner cities is well overrated, that a lot of it is just hype/fear of The Other/etc. that is not to say that poverty & shite conditions & the attendant suffering is conversely underrated. just that it's not really as dangerous as all that. of course being white/male/straight makes it considerably easier for me, personally, to be outgoing, but I'm not talking about my own safety so much as general observations from 7-8 years of living in "bad" neighborhoods (& not ones on the edge of gentrification in either) in Philly, Oakland, Chicago, etc.
It's not really about muggings or lack thereof.
I dunno where in Bushwick, I dunno tho where you're getting the assumption that I'd be hanging about the posher, white parts of town? I mean, whatever. *EDIT* not to get into some absurd contest about who's middle-class kid who hangs out in/knows more about harder neighborhoods, it just seems like a weird thing to assume
Anyway, I should probably just shut up about Brooklyn, where I've spent a grand total of maybe 10 days.
I disagree. I think in certain ways, the problems in American ghettos are vastly underestimated and misunderstood. The picture many white people who grew up in affluent neighborhoods have of the ghetto may be a media-distortion, but that doesn't mean the reality isn't utterly desperate and terrible. But then I've lived in "Puerto Rican heaven" for several years so I may have a different perspective on things than you do.