Surely video technology as it is currently employed - after the fact - can already be used to pin-point dodgy decisions and help disembarrass the game of corruption. The ref's decisions can already be assessed and, if deemed to be sub-par, the official can be relieved of his duties.
As Scott says, this doesn't seem to have happened so it's fair to suggest that something more might help/be needed. It also doesn't stop the corruption at the point at which it happens, which is surely when you want to stop it rather than merely preventing future cases (and even then only from that official - to be clear, corruption in Chinese football is incredibly widespread as I understand it. It's not just a case of villifying one of two referees). This particularly true in key fixtures - title deciders, key qualifying matches, knockout stages of cup competitions etc. etc.