Wuhan Killer Sneeze (thanks Tea)

[Leo]

HMG FTW, LOL.

 

[catalog]

The disease is just an endlessly modified means of vanquishing the West, and it's working wonderfully. If the West is so easily vanquished, it probably deserved to go anyway. We're in the "what next?" stage now, Berlin 1945, who gets to pick over the bones in such and such sector.

This plandemic theory is too neat for me. I could buy ww3, passing of policeman role to China, and longue duree World systems theory idea of power centres moving, and also that there is an information war of sorts.

But there would have to be some political drama surely, some kind of questioning of that, which hasn't happened.

So I'm not into that idea.

 

[catalog]

I thought it was sensible to try lockdown 1 until the death rate fell from its peak, but we carried on locking down for weeks after.

They had to do a second lockdown at some point to make out that lockdown one had been a crucial intervention: they can't have the indicators peak and then fall in the absence of interventions as it gives the lie to the models that supposedly inform their policy.

That seems way too schematised and forward thinking. No way they ever actually planned a lockdown 2

 

[mixed_biscuits]

This plandemic theory is too neat for me. I could buy ww3, passing of policeman role to China, and longue duree World systems theory idea of power centres moving, and also that there is an information war of sorts.

But there would have to be some political drama surely, some kind of questioning of that, which hasn't happened.

So I'm not into that idea.

There's no questioning because the West has already been vanquished behind the scenes and we're in the short transition of the Great Reset.

 

[HMGovt’s Glorious Return!]

Plenty of people questioning, but as we have never lived in any kind of democracy, the questions are easily dismissed, deflected, ignored.

 

[Mr. Tea]

He's always said that.

Huh, I thought he'd always been an absolute anti-lockdowner.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

That seems way too schematised and forward thinking. No way they ever actually planned a lockdown 2

They've done this on the micro-scale too in the earlier tier impositions, during which the indicators fell from their maxima after the measures could have had any effect.

It's not all face-saving and duplicity but...

 

[luka]

Huh, I thought he'd always been an absolute anti-lockdowner.

You don't study dissensus like I do.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Problem for the government is that they departed from their scientific advisors' counsel in imposing lockdown one and have to justify their actions retrospectively by ensuring that there is consistency moving forward.

 

[catalog]

You can't have a serious transfer of power without some dead bodies, and not flu bodies.

 

[catalog]

Problem for the government is that they departed from their scientific advisors' counsel in imposing lockdown one and have to justify their actions retrospectively by ensuring that there is consistency moving forward.

I don't think that's happening, they are making it up as they go along, based on looking at the r

 

[mixed_biscuits]

You can't have a serious transfer of power without some dead bodies, and not flu bodies.

It might not be a transfer of power as much as a reallocation of responsibility or a drawing-back of the curtain.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

I don't think that's happening, they are making it up as they go along, based on looking at the r

The R is derived from their pos test figures which depend on variables ultimately controlled by them.

Furthermore, there's no way to check much of this data independently.

 

[catalog]

Well I do agree with thst part, there's some cloak and dagger on that certainly.

 

[catalog]

It might not be a transfer of power as much as a reallocation of responsibility or a drawing-back of the curtain.

Yeah, so then this seems to discount the idea of China plandemic conspiracy theory?

 

[Leo]

To quote a famous Sailor Socialist: "You people have, like, worms in your brain, honestly".

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Yeah, so then this seems to discount the idea of China plandemic conspiracy theory?

Not necessarily: it might just mean the plandemic is planned at a higher level.

Covid's purpose is to ease the public into the Great Reset with minimal fuss; the elites, by hook or by crook, are already on board.

 

[catalog]

Don't buy it, but carry on. It's basically not very far from David icke position.

 

[mixed_biscuits]

Hmm ok

 

[mixed_biscuits]

If you look at the WEF website, they've clearly gone to a lot of trouble drawing up the Great Reset's plans; do you really think they won't action them?